Template:Did you know nominations/Orphan works in the United States: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
sorry if i'm not supposed to change this now! just adding a wikilink to "librarian" article |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Although I think this is a nice cleanup and addition of references, the previous version of July 4, 2012 has a ''prosesize.js=5251'' and the latest version is ''prosesize.js=4947''. Since this is not a new article, the prose portion needed to be expanded fivefold in order to be considered for DYK. Also, it's my understanding that direct external links are [[deprecated]]; perhaps move the "orphan-report.pdf" to a "Further Reading" section at the bottom of the page. [[User:Deadhenry|[+][dead.henry]]] ([[User talk:Deadhenry|talk]]) 03:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||
:*<!--Make first comment here--> |
|||
Revision as of 03:26, 24 October 2012
Orphan works in the United States
- ... that due to the lack of proper legislation, a modern librarian's biggest nightmare is an orphan work in the United States?
Created/expanded by Vijwiki (talk), Yushan717 (talk). Nominated by Yushan717 (talk) at 04:45, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Although I think this is a nice cleanup and addition of references, the previous version of July 4, 2012 has a prosesize.js=5251 and the latest version is prosesize.js=4947. Since this is not a new article, the prose portion needed to be expanded fivefold in order to be considered for DYK. Also, it's my understanding that direct external links are deprecated; perhaps move the "orphan-report.pdf" to a "Further Reading" section at the bottom of the page. [+][dead.henry] (talk) 03:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)