Talk:Hedonism Resorts: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:03, 13 November 2012

Caribbean Start‑class Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nudity Start‑class Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

AFD result - keep

This article was nominated for deletion on December 12 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

Rob e rt 00:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

I think that Hedonism provided the first template for a type of resort that is growing in popularity. I'm not personally going to be able to find the reliable sources to make the case for Hedonism being a historically important and influential resort, but I think the case could be made fairly strongly. With that potential, I think deleting the article would be a mistake. ike9898 (talk) 23:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hedonism resorts (II and the now closed III) as a cultural/historical site

I would tend to agree that the page could be allowed to stay up even with the closing of Hedo III, however it needs significant editing to make it worthy of an encyclopedic entry. There needs to be more content on its history and cultural significance or its impact on other resorts or sociological import since its creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohannVanbeek (talk • contribs) 14:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misdirection error

Right now there are two Hedonism Resorts pages: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_Resorts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_II

The second is titled Hedonism Resorts and indicates it is a redirect from Hedonism II. However, the content of the second page is not the same as the first. Recent edits in the first page are not reflected in the second page. There appears to be a problem with the redirect system. 35.9.35.242 (talk) 15:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 I would tend to agree that the page could be allowed to stay up even with the closing of Hedo III, however it needs significant editing to make it worthy of an encyclopedic entry.  There needs to be more content on its history and cultural significance or its impact on other resorts or sociological import since its creation.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:JohannVanbeek|JohannVanbeek]] ([[User talk:JohannVanbeek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/JohannVanbeek|contribs]]) 14:32, 14 April 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Misdirection error ==
+Right now there are two Hedonism Resorts pages:
+http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_Resorts
+http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedonism_II
+The second is titled Hedonism Resorts and indicates it is a redirect from Hedonism II. However, the content of the second page is not the same as the first. Recent edits in the first page are not reflected in the second page. There appears to be a problem with the redirect system. [[Special:Contributions/35.9.35.242|35.9.35.242]] ([[User talk:35.9.35.242|talk]]) 15:03, 13 November 2012 (UTC)