Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pigeon's Rock: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*'''Oppose''' Still too dark, shadow areas lack detail (and yes my monitor is correctly calibrated) and focus not perfect. The haze in the distance obscures most of the land in a photo which seems to be primarily of the sea and sky. Not really illustrative of Beirut at all. --[[User:Yummifruitbat|Yummifruitbat]] 15:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose''' Still too dark, shadow areas lack detail (and yes my monitor is correctly calibrated) and focus not perfect. The haze in the distance obscures most of the land in a photo which seems to be primarily of the sea and sky. Not really illustrative of Beirut at all. --[[User:Yummifruitbat|Yummifruitbat]] 15:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose'''. Photographic issues aside, this doesn't add to [[Beirut]] in a way that qualifies it for FP status. --[[User:Dante Alighieri|Dante Alighieri]] | [[User talk:Dante Alighieri|Talk]] 15:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Oppose'''. Photographic issues aside, this doesn't add to [[Beirut]] in a way that qualifies it for FP status. --[[User:Dante Alighieri|Dante Alighieri]] | [[User talk:Dante Alighieri|Talk]] 15:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Oppose''', It's too dark and just plain boring -- [[User:BWF89|BWF89]] 03:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
||
{{-}} |
{{-}} |
||
Revision as of 03:01, 10 May 2006
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
I came accross this image on Wiki Commons, and I really, really liked it. It is currently in the Beirut article, and the photo was taken by User:Bertilvidet.
- Nominate and support. —Khoikhoi 02:35, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Horizon not level and altogether too dark. Dr Zak 02:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilted, way too dark, buildings at left somewhat unsharp. --Janke | Talk 07:01, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. The nominative subject of the picture, the rock, is way too dark. howcheng {chat} 07:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose for the reasons above. And please I came accross this image on Wiki Commons, and I really, really liked it? It should be I came accross this image on the Beirut page and it immediately grabbed my attention and made me read the article. Without this image I would have had a hard time understanding what Beirut actually is. But.. ..no. --Dschwen 07:20, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. It shows the geography of the place well, but I think a shot in the day-time might have more value. Also, on my monitor, even version two doesn't have much shadow detail (though I think my monitor isn't calibrated correctly). --Pharaoh Hound 12:06, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Horizon is clearly tilted - Adrian Pingstone 20:26, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the input. Agree that the photo was tilted and too dark. I believe these issues are solved with the last version. Bertilvidet 13:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Still too dark, shadow areas lack detail (and yes my monitor is correctly calibrated) and focus not perfect. The haze in the distance obscures most of the land in a photo which seems to be primarily of the sea and sky. Not really illustrative of Beirut at all. --Yummifruitbat 15:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Photographic issues aside, this doesn't add to Beirut in a way that qualifies it for FP status. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 15:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, It's too dark and just plain boring -- BWF89 03:01, 10 May 2006 (UTC)