Talk:Resistance training: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:07, 15 December 2012

Health and fitness NA‑class Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

/Merger discussion

This article is a mess. Its like someone rushed to type it in 2 minutes. It NEEDS citations at least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.163.246.69 (talk) 04:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Empirical Findings

There are lots of important and useful findings of resistance training research. These should be placed in Wikipedia. I need to read the research more thoroughly first Ashernm (talk) 19:32, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Science of Resistance Training

If someone wants to rewrite this to be a good article, they have a fantastic research article they could summarize: http://faculty.pepperdine.edu/mfeltner/Classes/SPME330/ps1.pdf Ywaz (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Basic principles section

Not sure the last paragraph of the "Basic principles" section is proper. I think that the information could still be relevant but needs to be re-worded.MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 22:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to strength training

This definition looks to be original research. It defines "resistance training" as a specific kind of strength training utilizing hydraulic or elastic resistance. Firstly, that is not the way the term is commonly used in literature whether academic or not. Secondly, what is the point of this distinction? It makes no difference to training where the resistance comes from, assuming it is applied in the same direction & resistance curve.

If no-one can give a good reason to keep, I will merge this article and its corresponding section into the main strength training article. ··gracefool☺ 08:13, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now but clean up and add citations showing significance and contributions. --Maniwar (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - I thought much the same thing when I first encountered the article but assumed that it was some technical term that meant something specific to some group. If that's not the case it's just confusing. PRL42 (talk) 17:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I thought the same as you till I read this article above. If I had time I would myself work on it, but oh well...C'est la vie. I would definitely ask that this talk page be merged as well so that that link could be utilized, if it is merged. --Maniwar (talk) 01:07, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 }}  14:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
 :'''Merge''' - I thought much the same thing when I first encountered the article but assumed that it was some technical term that meant something specific to some group. If that's not the case it's just confusing. [[User:PRL42|PRL42]] ([[User talk:PRL42|talk]]) 17:02, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
+::I guess I thought the same as you till I read [http://faculty.pepperdine.edu/mfeltner/Classes/SPME330/ps1.pdf this article] above. If I had time I would myself work on it, but oh well...C'est la vie. I would definitely ask that this talk page be merged as well so that that link could be utilized, ''if'' it is merged. --{{User-multi
+ |doc=yes
+ |User=Maniwar
+ |1=t
+}}  01:07, 15 December 2012 (UTC)