User talk:Darkness Shines

White Terror Dispute

I have filed a complaint on the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard re the White Terror article.cwmacdougall 23:24, 5 November 2012

Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_December_5#Inter-Services_Intelligence_support_for_militants

Is there any policy against formation of cabals? ITopgun, Mar4d, Smsarmad....always manage to find and wind up in the same side when any India or Pakistan related article is nominated for deletion. How come? Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 13:23, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Because they all push the same point of view, which is nothing bad must be said about Pakistan. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

deltasim blp vio

sup man, I never used this before so bear with me ok? I am a friend of realfatrabbit and he got blocked and asked me to let you know that deltasim didn't like the result of the edit war between him and relafatrabbit. It was about a BLP vio. deltasim I guess went to another admin called jamesbwatson and had realfatrabbit blocked. the admin called jamesbwatson then added back the stuff deltasim added that was the BLP vio which realfatrabbit kept removing and caused the edit war. anyways, thats that, he just wanted me to tell you. thanks man

This is the page about the war that deltasim went to another admin called jamesbwatson to add back http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/3RRArchive202# User:Deltasim_and_User:ArealFatRabbit_reported_by_Mephistophelian_.28Result:_Declined.29

the edit war was on kid icarus page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.144.159.130 (talk) 00:42, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

That IP address has been blocked. It is an open proxy, which was being used to evade a block. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Reversal on Human rights violations in Balochistan

I happened to notice that you reverted an edit made by an IP recently. Fine, no worries. Nonetheless, I would like to draw your attention to the following and I hope that you might be kind enough to make some more edits (only if you deem it fit) to the same article about the massacre of Hazara Minority in Balochistan. Apparently, that IP was not exactly fibbing.

1. Persecution of Hazara people in Quetta
2. Hope fades away for Hazaras of Pakistan
3. International commission demanded to probe Hazara killings
4. A brief history of Hazara persecution
5. Pakistan's evolving sectarian schism

The Hazara community has been targeted, with great impunity, by outlawed militant organisations on at least six occasions in the current year. While all attacks have claimed precious lives, one of worst attacks against the community came last September, when a bus carrying Hazara passengers was stopped by assailants heavily armed with rocket launchers and Kalashnikovs. They identified Hazara men, took them off the bus and slaughtered them one by one within half a kilometre from a security check post. A similar incident was repeated a few days later in Akhtarabad area of Quetta. Some unconfirmed reports say “over 800 Hazaras have been killed in 24 incidents of mass-murder and 131 targeted ambushes since 2001.”

--Hope fades away for Hazaras of Pakistan

"The locations of the hideouts and training camps of the groups involved in attacks on Hazaras are not secret," Sardar Sa'adat said. "The government and the law-enforcement agencies seem to have no interest in protecting us."

--A brief history of Hazara persecution

By the way, the Pakistani Army and its intelligence wing, the ISI, have accused foreign interference in Balochistan's affairs, without directly responding to allegations against themselves for allowing the banned terrorist organizations to operate freely and with complete impunity (further info on BBC-ref and Deadly Connections: States That Sponsor Terrorism By Daniel Byman, ISBN 0-521-83973-4, 2005, Cambridge University Press, pp 155).

I hope you find these useful. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 17:11, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Dear Darkness Shines,

Please explain why you have engaged in an editing war with me, reverting my edits four times--three using the undo botton--without leaving any substantive discussion in the talk page of the article as I had repeatedly requested in my edit summaries [1]. You've also made a number of unpleasant accusations in a remarkably uncollegial manner on my talk page [2]. I do not believe calling on me to "stop reinserting junk" is called for, especially since you've reverted those edits four times without substantive explanations of your actions despite my requests. I maintain that there is no copyright violation involved in my post, and you linkvio suggestion needs to be proven. In addition, contrary to what you claim, a number of the articles i cite explicitly mention Judge Nizamul Huq's association with the Nirmul Committees; and a more detailed explanation as to the reliability of secularvoiceofbangladesh.org would be in order.

I await arbitration on these matters. Aminul802 (talk) 13:44, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Attention needed in International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) Article

NPOV violation took place on International Crimes Tribunal (Bangladesh) article. Would you please check it? --Freemesm (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Women in India

Hi there, I just wanted to check with you why the recent content by User Heyitsoil7 was removed? I thought the content was actually well referenced and decently written. Zhanzhao (talk) 02:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)