User talk:Merecat

Archive 1

As of 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC), I've made a talk archive. I'll try to go back later and add to that some other information which I previously deleted and which some have suggested is better to archive. Merecat 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Away message

I am still away from any confrontation type dialogs on this page at least until Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination). It's very important for my personal serentiy that I take one day at a time here. I know that some have posted in here apparent resentment, but I feel that the more harsh accusations/complaints are not warranted and I ask that people who wish to be harsh with me along those lines not post here. On the other hand, constructive comments are always welcome. Merecat 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

It's gone. At least some semblance of NPOV prevailed. "Merge and delete" but since it's already "merged" I think the overall affect will be "delete".--Tbeatty 03:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

RfAr

You archived the notification, and have so far chosen not to respond to the reopen request for RfAr. Just wanted to make crystal clear that you are no longer blocked, and have every opprtunity to respond to the charge that you are, in fact, a blocked user (Rex0714040), violating ArbComm. A number of good faith editors await your response. Good day. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 19:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I can ask a simple question without being harsh: Are you Rex071404 or not? I'd figure if you weren't you'd want to clear your name as soon as possible. Please answer the question. --kizzle 20:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I would suggest both of you Ryan Fleas~along and Kizzle mind your own business and leave Merecat alone. Freezling, exactly whose vigilante boy are you? And please wipe the snot off your nose and the front of your shirt. It's disgusting. thewolfstar 22:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to thank you for that lovely comment. Have a wonderful and fun-filled day. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 23:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Please no personal attacks against Ryan or anyone else. Also, you are welcome to join in any discussions between Merecat and I, however I must ask that you remain polite and allow me to have my discussion with Merecat. Thanks in advance! P.S., I have answered many of your questions posed to KWH in Merecat's archives, if you wanted to know the answers. --kizzle 22:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Away msg update

While waiting to see if this Rationales provided by advocates of the impeachment of George W. Bush actually gets deleted as per the result of this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination), which was:

The result of the debate was merge and delete. Among the policy-based opinions voiced below, there is an overwhelming consensus that an article with this title should not exist. It is absolutely irrelevant whether the article is of sufficient length, has references, etc. Rather, this debate is about the inherent merit of the topic of this article and its place within the larger context of related articles. Those who have actually managed to address these core issues of this debate are clearly in favor of not including an article on this topic in this encyclopedia. Opinions on merging are a bit more divided; however, merging worthwhile changes between related articles is standard procedure. However, any necessary mergers may have already happened (see Alphax' comment). There is no overwhelming support for leaving behind a redirect. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 10:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

I took the time to read Ryan's personal page and saw a link to ('What is Your World View'). For what it's worth, here are the results of my honest answers to that test:

You scored as Cultural Creative. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational. Cultural Creative 50% Romanticist 38% Postmodernist 31% Fundamentalist 25% Modernist 19% Materialist 13% Existentialist 13% Idealist 6%

I'll check back in here in a few more days. Merecat 06:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Are you Rex071404 or not? --kizzle 19:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

I think that by bagering him about being a sockpupet or asking him if his is someone or not is not going to get you an answer. Aeon 21:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

It's just disappointing, if he's not Rex than he should answer. If he is, than that's stupid because if he had just come back on his original username I would have welcomed him back, I even tried to get him to stay last time. --kizzle 21:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

It sounds like it shouldn't matter since your response would be to welcome him. So why the need for an answer?--Tbeatty 21:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Because me and rex have a lot of history, I want to know who I'm talking to, or whether this is someone completely new. It's really not that complicated. --kizzle 21:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Ooh, here was my score:

You scored as Cultural Creative. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational. Cultural Creative 81% Existentialist 56% Postmodernist 31% Romanticist 31% Idealist 31% Fundamentalist 25% Modernist 25% Materialist 19%

--Tbeatty 03:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Merecat request unblocking

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Merecat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

invalid - see my talk page

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=invalid - see my talk page |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=invalid - see my talk page |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=invalid - see my talk page |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Katefan0 has blocked me without a finding of fact. This is out of process and inappropriate. Merecat 19:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)