Jump to content

User talk:Merecat: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Blocked: thanks
Merecat (talk | contribs)
tidy up
Line 1: Line 1:
== Merecat requests unblocking ==
[[User talk:Merecat/Archive1|Archive 1]]

As of 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC), I've made a talk archive. I'll try to go back later and add to that some other information which I previously deleted and which some have suggested is better to archive. [[User:Merecat|Merecat]] 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

== Away message ==

I am still away from any confrontation type dialogs on this page at least until [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination)]]. It's very important for my personal serentiy that I take one day at a time here. I know that some have posted in here apparent resentment, but I feel that the more harsh accusations/complaints are not warranted and I ask that people who wish to be harsh with me along those lines not post here. On the other hand, constructive comments are always welcome. [[User:Merecat|Merecat]] 19:45, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

:It's gone. At least some semblance of NPOV prevailed. "Merge and delete" but since it's already "merged" I think the overall affect will be "delete".--[[User:Tbeatty|Tbeatty]] 03:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

==RfAr==

You archived the notification, and have so far chosen not to respond to the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Request_to_reopen_hearing_.27Rex071404_4.27 reopen request for RfAr]. Just wanted to make crystal clear that you are no longer blocked, and have every opprtunity to respond to the charge that you are, in fact, a blocked user (Rex0714040), violating ArbComm. A number of good faith editors await your response. Good day. -- [[User:RyanFreisling]] [[User_talk:RyanFreisling|@]] 19:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
:I can ask a simple question without being harsh: Are you Rex071404 or not? I'd figure if you weren't you'd want to clear your name as soon as possible. Please answer the question. --[[User:Kizzle|kizzle]] 20:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

::I would suggest both of you Ryan Fleas~along and Kizzle mind your own business and leave Merecat alone. Freezling, exactly whose vigilante boy are you? And please wipe the snot off your nose and the front of your shirt. It's disgusting. [[User:Thewolfstar|thewolfstar]] 22:37, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
::::I'd like to thank you for that lovely comment. Have a wonderful and fun-filled day. -- [[User:RyanFreisling]] [[User_talk:RyanFreisling|@]] 23:15, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
:::Please no personal attacks against Ryan or anyone else. Also, you are welcome to join in any discussions between Merecat and I, however I must ask that you remain polite and allow me to have my discussion with Merecat. Thanks in advance! P.S., I have answered many of your questions posed to KWH in Merecat's archives, if you wanted to know the answers. --[[User:Kizzle|kizzle]] 22:47, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

== Away msg update ==

While waiting to see if this [[Rationales provided by advocates of the impeachment of George W. Bush]] actually gets deleted as per the result of this [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination)]], which was:
<blockquote>
''The result of the debate was merge and delete. Among the policy-based opinions voiced below, there is an overwhelming consensus that an article with this title should not exist. It is absolutely irrelevant whether the article is of sufficient length, has references, etc. Rather, this debate is about the inherent merit of the topic of this article and its place within the larger context of related articles. Those who have actually managed to address these core issues of this debate are clearly in favor of not including an article on this topic in this encyclopedia. Opinions on merging are a bit more divided; however, merging worthwhile changes between related articles is standard procedure. However, any necessary mergers may have already happened (see Alphax' comment). There is no overwhelming support for leaving behind a redirect. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 10:09, 9 May 2006 (UTC)''
</blockquote>

I took the time to read Ryan's personal page and saw a link to ('[http://quizfarm.com/test.php?q_id=23320 What is Your World View]'). For what it's worth, here are the results of my honest answers to that test:

<TABLE WIDTH="350" BORDER="0"
CELLSPACING="1" CELLPADDING="0">
<TR>
<TD WIDTH="100%">&nbsp;You scored as <B>Cultural Creative</B>.
Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this
realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized
religion but still feels as if there is something greater than
ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious.
Life has a meaning outside of the rational.<BR>
<BR>
<TABLE BORDER="0" WIDTH="300" CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0">
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Cultural Creative</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="50"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">50%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Romanticist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="38"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">38%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Postmodernist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="31"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">31%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Fundamentalist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="25"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">25%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Modernist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="19"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">19%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Materialist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="13"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">13%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Existentialist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="13"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">13%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">Idealist</FONT></TD>
<TD><TABLE BORDER="1" CELLPADDING="0" CELLSPACING="0" WIDTH="6"
BGCOLOR="#dddddd">
<TR>
<TD></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
<TD><FONT SIZE="-2" FACE="Arial">6%</FONT></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>


I'll check back in here in a few more days. [[User:Merecat|Merecat]] 06:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
:Are you Rex071404 or not? --[[User:Kizzle|kizzle]] 19:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
::I think that by bagering him about being a sockpupet or asking him if his is someone or not is not going to get you an answer. [[User:Aeon1006|Aeon]] 21:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
:::It's just disappointing, if he's not Rex than he should answer. If he is, than that's stupid because if he had just come back on his original username I would have welcomed him back, I even tried to get him to stay last time. --[[User:Kizzle|kizzle]] 21:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
::::It sounds like it shouldn't matter since your response would be to welcome him. So why the need for an answer?--[[User:Tbeatty|Tbeatty]] 21:49, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
:::::Because me and rex have a lot of history, I want to know who I'm talking to, or whether this is someone completely new. It's really not that complicated. --[[User:Kizzle|kizzle]] 21:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Ooh, here was my score:
<table border='0' cellpadding='5' cellspacing='0' width='600'><tr><td></td><td> You scored as <b>Cultural Creative</b>. Cultural Creatives are probably the newest group to enter this realm. You are a modern thinker who tends to shy away from organized religion but still feels as if there is something greater than ourselves. You are very spiritual, even if you are not religious. Life has a meaning outside of the rational.<br><br><table border='0' width='300' cellspacing='0' cellpadding='0'><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Cultural Creative</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='81' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>81%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Existentialist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='56' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>56%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Postmodernist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='31' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>31%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Romanticist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='31' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>31%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Idealist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='31' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>31%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Fundamentalist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='25' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>25%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Modernist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='25' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>25%</font></td></tr><tr><td><p><font face='Arial' size='1'>Materialist</font></p></td><td><table border='1' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='0' width='19' bgcolor='#dddddd'><tr><td></td></tr></table></td><td><font face='Arial' size='1'>19%</font></td></tr></td></tr></table><br></font></table>
--[[User:Tbeatty|Tbeatty]] 03:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

== Merecat request unblocking ==
{{unblock|invalid - see my talk page}}
{{unblock|invalid - see my talk page}}
Katefan0 has blocked me without a finding of fact and in excess of any sanctions which some contend might apply regarding [[John Kerry]] editing and for other invalid reasons. This is out of process and inappropriate. [[User:Merecat|Merecat]] 19:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Katefan0 has blocked me without a finding of fact and in excess of any sanctions which some contend might apply regarding [[John Kerry]] editing and for other invalid reasons. This is out of process and inappropriate. [[User:Merecat|Merecat]] 19:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

== Blocked ==

I have blocked you indefinitely for sockpuppetry ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_CheckUser/Archive/May_2006#70.84.56.166.2C_et_al. checkuser]) to evade your arbcom [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 4|decision]] not to edit [[John Kerry]], and for other disruptive behavior. As you are aware, a request to reopen your case to consider this most recent behavior has been placed at [[WP:RFAr]]. You've had ample time to respond to it and have chosen not to; if you change your mind and wish to respond to the case you may email any arbitrator via the "E-mail this user" link. &middot; [[User:Katefan0|Ka]][[User:JCarriker/TC|t]][[User:Katefan0|efan0]] <sup>[[User talk:Katefan0|(scribble)]]</sup>/<small>[[User:Katefan0/Poll|poll]]</small> 19:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

:Kate, thanks for the message. I disagree that your assertions and actions against me today have the requisite validity to support what you have said and done, but you do have the power to block and can do with it as you wish - it doesn't make you right though. If and/or when your actions against me here today cease to be in effect, I guess I can start editing again at that point. Have a nice day. [[User:Merecat|Merecat]] 19:20, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
::I will not unblock you. I've reported the block at AN/I, and it's possible that another administrator might disagree with me enough to lift your block. If that's the case, I won't reverse it. At any rate, please feel free to appeal to the arbcom through email, and of course your ability to post here is unrestricted. &middot; [[User:Katefan0|Ka]][[User:JCarriker/TC|t]][[User:Katefan0|efan0]] <sup>[[User talk:Katefan0|(scribble)]]</sup>/<small>[[User:Katefan0/Poll|poll]]</small> 19:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:43, 12 May 2006

Merecat requests unblocking

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Merecat (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

invalid - see my talk page

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=invalid - see my talk page |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=invalid - see my talk page |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=invalid - see my talk page |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Katefan0 has blocked me without a finding of fact and in excess of any sanctions which some contend might apply regarding John Kerry editing and for other invalid reasons. This is out of process and inappropriate. Merecat 19:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]