Herodian tetrarchy: Difference between revisions
m →The Tetrarchy: copyedit, clarity edits, MOS implementation, and/or AWB general fixes using AWB (8686) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|subdivision = [[wikt:tetrarchy|Tetrarchy]] |
|subdivision = [[wikt:tetrarchy|Tetrarchy]] |
||
|nation = the [[Roman Empire]] |
|nation = the [[Roman Empire]] |
||
|year_start = 4 |
|year_start = 4 BC |
||
|year_end = 6 |
|year_end = 6 AD |
||
|p1 = Herodian kingdom |
|p1 = Herodian kingdom |
||
|flag_p1 = Menora Titus.png |
|flag_p1 = Menora Titus.png |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
|title_leader = [[Ethnarch]] |
|title_leader = [[Ethnarch]] |
||
|leader1 = [[Herod Archelaus]] |
|leader1 = [[Herod Archelaus]] |
||
|year_leader1 = 4 |
|year_leader1 = 4 BC - 6 AD |
||
|event_start = death of [[Herod the Great]] |
|event_start = death of [[Herod the Great]] |
||
|event_end = formation of [[Judaea (Roman province)]] |
|event_end = formation of [[Judaea (Roman province)]] |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''Tetrarchy of Judea''', one of the ''Herodian Tetrarchies'', was formed following the death of [[Herod the Great]] in 4 |
The '''Tetrarchy of Judea''', one of the ''Herodian Tetrarchies'', was formed following the death of [[Herod the Great]] in 4 BC, when his kingdom was divided between his sons as an inheritance. Judea, the major section of the tetrarchies, was transformed by Rome in 6 CE, abolishing the rule of [[Herod Archelaus]], and forming the [[Judea (Roman province)|Province of Judea]] by joining together [[Judea|Judea proper]] (biblical [[Kingdom of Judah|Judah]]), [[Samaria]], and Idumea (biblical [[Edom]]).<ref>H.H. Ben-Sasson, ''A History of the Jewish People'', Harvard University Press, 1976, ISBN 0-674-39731-2, page 246: "When Archelaus was deposed from the ethnarchy in 6 CE, Judea proper, Samaria and Idumea were converted into a Roman province under the name Iudaea."</ref> However, other parts of the Herodian Tetrarchies continued to function under [[Herodians]]. Thus, [[Philip the Tetrarch]] ruled Batanea, with Trachonitis, as well as Auranitis until 34 CE (his domain later incorporated into [[Roman Syria|Province of Syria]]), while [[Herod Antipas]] ruled [[Galilee]] and [[Perea]] until 34 AD. |
||
==The Tetrarchy== |
==The Tetrarchy== |
||
At the time of his death Herod ruled over most of the South Western [[Levant]], as a [[client-state]] of the [[Roman Empire]]. Antipas was not Herod's first choice of heir. That honor fell to [[Aristobulus IV|Aristobulus]] and Alexander, Herod's sons by the Hasmonean princess Mariamne. It was only after they were executed (c. 7 |
At the time of his death Herod ruled over most of the South Western [[Levant]], as a [[client-state]] of the [[Roman Empire]]. Antipas was not Herod's first choice of heir. That honor fell to [[Aristobulus IV|Aristobulus]] and Alexander, Herod's sons by the Hasmonean princess Mariamne. It was only after they were executed (c. 7 BC), and Herod's oldest son [[Antipater (son of Herod the Great)|Antipater]] was convicted of trying to poison his father (5 BC), that the now elderly Herod fell back on his youngest son Antipas, revising his will to make him heir.<ref>Bruce 6–7; Schürer 320–325.</ref> During his fatal illness in 4 BC, Herod had yet another change of heart about the succession. According to the final version of his will, Antipas' elder brother Archelaus was now to become king of Judea, [[Idumea]] and Samaria, while Antipas would rule [[Galilee]] and [[Perea (Holy Land)|Perea]] with the lesser title of tetrarch. Philip was to receive [[Gaulanitis]] (the [[Golan Heights]]), Batanaea (southern Syria), [[Trachonitis]] and Auranitis ([[Hauran]]).<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities'' [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=J.+AJ+17.188 17.188–189], ''War'' [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=J.+BJ+1.664 1.664].</ref> |
||
Because of Judea's status as a Roman [[client kingdom]], Herod's plans for the succession had to be ratified by [[Augustus]]. The three heirs of Herod therefore travelled to Rome to make their claims, Antipas arguing he ought to inherit the whole kingdom and the others maintaining that Herod's final will ought to be honored. Despite qualified support for Antipas from Herodian family members in Rome, who favoured direct Roman rule of Judea but considered Antipas preferable to his brother, Augustus largely confirmed the division of territory set out by Herod in his final will. Archelaus had, however, to be content with the title of [[ethnarch]] rather than king.<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities'' [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=J.+AJ+17.224 17.224–249], [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=J.+AJ+17.299 299–323].</ref> |
Because of Judea's status as a Roman [[client kingdom]], Herod's plans for the succession had to be ratified by [[Augustus]]. The three heirs of Herod therefore travelled to Rome to make their claims, Antipas arguing he ought to inherit the whole kingdom and the others maintaining that Herod's final will ought to be honored. Despite qualified support for Antipas from Herodian family members in Rome, who favoured direct Roman rule of Judea but considered Antipas preferable to his brother, Augustus largely confirmed the division of territory set out by Herod in his final will. Archelaus had, however, to be content with the title of [[ethnarch]] rather than king.<ref>Josephus, ''Antiquities'' [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=J.+AJ+17.224 17.224–249], [http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ptext?lookup=J.+AJ+17.299 299–323].</ref> |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
*[[Philip the Tetrarch|Philip I]], Herod’s son by his fifth wife [[Cleopatra of Jerusalem]], became Tetrarch of the northern part of Herod’s kingdom. Luke the evangelist lists Philip’s territories as [[Iturea]] and [[Trachonitis]]: [[Josephus]] gives his territories variously as [[Batanea]], [[Gaulanitis]], Trachonitis and [[Paneas]] ( ''Antiquities'' XVII, 8 : 1) and Batanea, Trachonitis, [[Auranitis]], and "a certain part of what is called the [[Abilene (biblical)|House of Zenodorus]]" (''Ant'' XVII, 11 : 4). A number of these names refer to the same places, found now in modern-day [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]]. |
*[[Philip the Tetrarch|Philip I]], Herod’s son by his fifth wife [[Cleopatra of Jerusalem]], became Tetrarch of the northern part of Herod’s kingdom. Luke the evangelist lists Philip’s territories as [[Iturea]] and [[Trachonitis]]: [[Josephus]] gives his territories variously as [[Batanea]], [[Gaulanitis]], Trachonitis and [[Paneas]] ( ''Antiquities'' XVII, 8 : 1) and Batanea, Trachonitis, [[Auranitis]], and "a certain part of what is called the [[Abilene (biblical)|House of Zenodorus]]" (''Ant'' XVII, 11 : 4). A number of these names refer to the same places, found now in modern-day [[Syria]] and [[Lebanon]]. |
||
In a turbulent period of history, the rule of the tetrarchs was relatively uneventful. The most trouble fell to Archelaus, who was faced with sedition by the [[Pharisees]] at the beginning of his reign, and crushed it with great severity. After ruling for 10 years he was removed by the emperor [[Augustus]] in 6 |
In a turbulent period of history, the rule of the tetrarchs was relatively uneventful. The most trouble fell to Archelaus, who was faced with sedition by the [[Pharisees]] at the beginning of his reign, and crushed it with great severity. After ruling for 10 years he was removed by the emperor [[Augustus]] in 6 AD, following complaints about his cruelty and his offences against the [[613 Commandments|Mosaic law]]. He was replaced by a Roman [[prefect]], and his territory re-organized as the Roman province of [[Iudaea]]. |
||
Philip ruled Ituraea and Trachonitis until his death in 34 |
Philip ruled Ituraea and Trachonitis until his death in 34 AD when he was succeeded as tetrarch by [[Herod Agrippa I]], who had previously been ruler of [[Chalcis, Syria|Chalcis]]. Agrippa surrendered Chalcis to his brother [[Herod of Chalcis|Herod]] and ruled in Philip’s stead. On the death of Herod Antipas in 39 AD Herod Agrippa became ruler of Galilee also, and in 41 AD, as a mark of favour by the emperor [[Claudius]], succeeded the Roman prefect [[Marullus (prefect of Judea)|Marullus]] as ruler of Iudaea. With this acquisition, a Herodian Kingdom of the Jews was nominally re-established until 44 AD though there is no indication that status as a province was suspended. |
||
==Three or four?== |
==Three or four?== |
||
Revision as of 12:59, 9 January 2013
| Herodian Tetrarchy of Judea | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tetrarchy of the Roman Empire | |||||||||
| 4 BC–6 AD | |||||||||
 The Tetrarchy of Judea, shown in light green. | |||||||||
| Capital | Jerusalem | ||||||||
| Government | |||||||||
| Ethnarch | |||||||||
• 4 BC - 6 AD | Herod Archelaus | ||||||||
| Historical era | Augustan Age | ||||||||
• death of Herod the Great | 4 BC | ||||||||
• formation of Judaea (Roman province) | 6 AD | ||||||||
| |||||||||
| Today part of |  Israel State of Palestine | ||||||||
The Tetrarchy of Judea, one of the Herodian Tetrarchies, was formed following the death of Herod the Great in 4 BC, when his kingdom was divided between his sons as an inheritance. Judea, the major section of the tetrarchies, was transformed by Rome in 6 CE, abolishing the rule of Herod Archelaus, and forming the Province of Judea by joining together Judea proper (biblical Judah), Samaria, and Idumea (biblical Edom).[1] However, other parts of the Herodian Tetrarchies continued to function under Herodians. Thus, Philip the Tetrarch ruled Batanea, with Trachonitis, as well as Auranitis until 34 CE (his domain later incorporated into Province of Syria), while Herod Antipas ruled Galilee and Perea until 34 AD.
The Tetrarchy
At the time of his death Herod ruled over most of the South Western Levant, as a client-state of the Roman Empire. Antipas was not Herod's first choice of heir. That honor fell to Aristobulus and Alexander, Herod's sons by the Hasmonean princess Mariamne. It was only after they were executed (c. 7 BC), and Herod's oldest son Antipater was convicted of trying to poison his father (5 BC), that the now elderly Herod fell back on his youngest son Antipas, revising his will to make him heir.[2] During his fatal illness in 4 BC, Herod had yet another change of heart about the succession. According to the final version of his will, Antipas' elder brother Archelaus was now to become king of Judea, Idumea and Samaria, while Antipas would rule Galilee and Perea with the lesser title of tetrarch. Philip was to receive Gaulanitis (the Golan Heights), Batanaea (southern Syria), Trachonitis and Auranitis (Hauran).[3]
Because of Judea's status as a Roman client kingdom, Herod's plans for the succession had to be ratified by Augustus. The three heirs of Herod therefore travelled to Rome to make their claims, Antipas arguing he ought to inherit the whole kingdom and the others maintaining that Herod's final will ought to be honored. Despite qualified support for Antipas from Herodian family members in Rome, who favoured direct Roman rule of Judea but considered Antipas preferable to his brother, Augustus largely confirmed the division of territory set out by Herod in his final will. Archelaus had, however, to be content with the title of ethnarch rather than king.[4]
Eventually, after his death the kingdom was divided between three of Herod's sons:
- Archelaus, his son by his fourth wife Malthace the Samaritan, received the lion's share of the kingdom; Idumaea, Judea and Samaria, and the title of Ethnarch ("ruler of the people"; in this case, the Jews, Samaritans, and Idumeans).
- Herod Antipas, Archelaus’ brother, became Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea.
- Philip I, Herod’s son by his fifth wife Cleopatra of Jerusalem, became Tetrarch of the northern part of Herod’s kingdom. Luke the evangelist lists Philip’s territories as Iturea and Trachonitis: Josephus gives his territories variously as Batanea, Gaulanitis, Trachonitis and Paneas ( Antiquities XVII, 8 : 1) and Batanea, Trachonitis, Auranitis, and "a certain part of what is called the House of Zenodorus" (Ant XVII, 11 : 4). A number of these names refer to the same places, found now in modern-day Syria and Lebanon.
In a turbulent period of history, the rule of the tetrarchs was relatively uneventful. The most trouble fell to Archelaus, who was faced with sedition by the Pharisees at the beginning of his reign, and crushed it with great severity. After ruling for 10 years he was removed by the emperor Augustus in 6 AD, following complaints about his cruelty and his offences against the Mosaic law. He was replaced by a Roman prefect, and his territory re-organized as the Roman province of Iudaea.
Philip ruled Ituraea and Trachonitis until his death in 34 AD when he was succeeded as tetrarch by Herod Agrippa I, who had previously been ruler of Chalcis. Agrippa surrendered Chalcis to his brother Herod and ruled in Philip’s stead. On the death of Herod Antipas in 39 AD Herod Agrippa became ruler of Galilee also, and in 41 AD, as a mark of favour by the emperor Claudius, succeeded the Roman prefect Marullus as ruler of Iudaea. With this acquisition, a Herodian Kingdom of the Jews was nominally re-established until 44 AD though there is no indication that status as a province was suspended.
Three or four?
The word Tetrarch suggests four rulers (“ruler of a quarter “); however Josephus, in the context of describing Herod’s legacy, only mentions three. He refers to Archelaus, who had “one half of that which had been subject to Herod”, and for Philip and Antipas “the other half, divided into two parts”. (Antiquities XVII, 11 : 4) On the other hand, Luke the Evangelist refers to Lysanias, tetrarch of Abilene, in his list of rulers at the time of John the Baptist, alongside Pontius Pilate (one of a series of Roman governors who replaced Archelaus), Herod (Antipas) and Philip (Luke 3 : 1). Josephus’ reference to one half the kingdom may signify two quarters, that Archelaus was ruler of two tetrarchies. This would suggest that division into quarters was already established, and that Lysanias’ quarter was part of a different tetrarchy in Syria; this is credible, as Herod III, brother of Herod Agrippa I, was tetrarch of Chalcis, which was to the north, outside Herod’s kingdom. Or it may be that Josephus, in describing the inheritances of Herod’s sons, omitted to mention Lysanias, or his predecessor, as they were not Herodians. The reference to “one half of the kingdom” could then be understood as a geographical, rather than a political observation; Archelaus’ share of the kingdom covered about half the territory, and more than half the revenue, owned by Herod. It is the view of W Smith, referring to Abilene, that Abilene,or part of it, was subject to Herod before his death, and held by Lysanias as a tetrarchy from him. The territory was returned later to the Herodians, the first part by Caligula to Herod Agrippa I, the remainder by Claudius to Herod Agrippa II.
References
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Smith, William, ed. (1854–1857). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography. London: John Murray. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Easton, Matthew George (1897). Easton's Bible Dictionary (New and revised ed.). T. Nelson and Sons. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
- ^ H.H. Ben-Sasson, A History of the Jewish People, Harvard University Press, 1976, ISBN 0-674-39731-2, page 246: "When Archelaus was deposed from the ethnarchy in 6 CE, Judea proper, Samaria and Idumea were converted into a Roman province under the name Iudaea."
- ^ Bruce 6–7; Schürer 320–325.
- ^ Josephus, Antiquities 17.188–189, War 1.664.
- ^ Josephus, Antiquities 17.224–249, 299–323.
External links
- Smith, William (editor); Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography, "Abilene", London, (1854)