Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SpyHunter: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Turlo Lomon (talk | contribs) →SpyHunter: keep and detailed explanation |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:GNG]]. The topic is a [[WP:N|non-notable]] software in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. <font face="Impact">[[User:TBrandley#top|TBr]][[Special:EmailUser|and]][[Special:Contributions/TBrandley|ley]]</font> <sup>([[User talk:TBrandley#top|what's up]])</sup> 19:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per [[WP:GNG]]. The topic is a [[WP:N|non-notable]] software in [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. <font face="Impact">[[User:TBrandley#top|TBr]][[Special:EmailUser|and]][[Special:Contributions/TBrandley|ley]]</font> <sup>([[User talk:TBrandley#top|what's up]])</sup> 19:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' and retarget to [[Spy Hunter]]. [[User:UW Dawgs|UW Dawgs]] ([[User talk:UW Dawgs|talk]]) 19:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' and retarget to [[Spy Hunter]]. [[User:UW Dawgs|UW Dawgs]] ([[User talk:UW Dawgs|talk]]) 19:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Strong Keep But Fix''' - Nomination is a bit deceptive. Yes, the company wrote an [[WP:COI]] article about their software... in 2006 (aka over 6 years ago). Since then, the article has been seriously reworked, sabotaged, reworked, sabotaged, etc. There are a ton of references missing from the current version of the article, specifically all of the negative reviews. The software is crap (imo), but there have been plenty of reviews done on it over the years that you can find links to by viewing history. It appears that the company is trying to remove negative press (a current [[WP:COI]] issue, but one that doesn't require deletion. [[User:Turlo Lomon|Turlo Lomon]] ([[User talk:Turlo Lomon|talk]]) 19:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:57, 10 January 2013
- SpyHunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software article written by the makers of the software, User:Enigmasoftwaregroup. See also the previous discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enigma software group. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 19:18, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:GNG. The topic is a non-notable software in reliable sources. TBrandley (what's up) 19:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete and retarget to Spy Hunter. UW Dawgs (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Keep But Fix - Nomination is a bit deceptive. Yes, the company wrote an WP:COI article about their software... in 2006 (aka over 6 years ago). Since then, the article has been seriously reworked, sabotaged, reworked, sabotaged, etc. There are a ton of references missing from the current version of the article, specifically all of the negative reviews. The software is crap (imo), but there have been plenty of reviews done on it over the years that you can find links to by viewing history. It appears that the company is trying to remove negative press (a current WP:COI issue, but one that doesn't require deletion. Turlo Lomon (talk) 19:57, 10 January 2013 (UTC)