Talk:ArmaLite AR-50: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:39, 14 January 2013

Firearms Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge Armalite AR50 into here

This article seems to have the more correct name, according to the manufacturer's website. Mark Hurd 2 July 2005 04:30 (UTC)

The correct name is ArmaLite AR50-A1, but to signify the latest interation fo the rifle, it has been updated to a AR50-A1B. But the "B" doesn't need to be in the title. JohnC76 (talk) 00:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added pictures, but if someone knows how to move them to the right hand side like other wiki pages with images, I'd appreciate it. JohnC76 (talk) 00:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --JohnC76 (talk) 06:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First off, the person kept deleteing the .416 barrett specs from this wiki. He claimed copyright, so I reworded everything. Even after rewording it, now he puts up this stupid notice that the entire page is up for deletion due to copyright.

Did I not just fix what he deleted (416 specs) twice in my own words? YES!!!!!

I am in the process of contacting ArmaLite for permission to copy anything off their site to add to this.

If this gets deleted before that and me fixing some wording, then I will not be back to rebuild this page as it has already took a lot of my time to build up with pictures of my own that I took, content, etc. Add the fact this person is really pissing me off trolling the page deleting my work.

Thanks...

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --JohnC76 (talk) 06:48, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is just the specs of the friggin' rifle!

You people need to get this guy that deleted the 416 description for vandalism.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --JohnC76 (talk) 06:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW..

There are only so many things that describe this rifle.

barrel twist caliber cartridge name specs on bedding of stock brake design

etc......

It's like saying the description of a Ford V8 engine is a copyright infringement because you specified liters, number of pistons, spark plugs, etc.....

Have you ever looked at another gun article? Do ANY other gun articles look like this one? This looks like a catalouge page! Gtwfan52 (talk) 08:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, guys! You have just deleted all the relevant info on all 3 makes of the Ar50!!! You do realize the specs with asterisks are like the specs on a car engine? There is no way to reword specs like bore twist, barrel length, design and materials of the rifle, etc. As for the ridiculous comment about it looking like an advertisement or promotion, I am an owner of an Ar50 rifle, I only put concise facts about the rifle and all the pictures I took of my rifle. If you want to call it an ad, promo, or whatever, go for it. I won't be back to fix the page. Don't have anymore time to waste with you or wikipedia. If folks google the rifle, the Armalite page will come up right with wiki at the top of google so no loss. Have a nice day. JohnC76 (talk) 09:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:07, 14 January 2013 edit John from Idegon (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 107,583 edits →‎Contested deletion: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:39, 14 January 2013 edit undo JohnC76 (talk \| contribs) 66 edits m I'm done since you deleted all my work.... Next edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:

	:Have you ever looked at another gun article? Do ANY other gun articles look like this one? This looks like a catalouge page! [[User:Gtwfan52\|Gtwfan52]] ([[User talk:Gtwfan52\|talk]]) 08:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)		:Have you ever looked at another gun article? Do ANY other gun articles look like this one? This looks like a catalouge page! [[User:Gtwfan52\|Gtwfan52]] ([[User talk:Gtwfan52\|talk]]) 08:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

			'''Congrats, guys! You have just deleted all the relevant info on all 3 makes of the Ar50!!! You do realize the specs with asterisks are like the specs on a car engine? There is no way to reword specs like bore twist, barrel length, design and materials of the rifle, etc. As for the ridiculous comment about it looking like an advertisement or promotion, I am an owner of an Ar50 rifle, I only put concise facts about the rifle and all the pictures I took of my rifle. If you want to call it an ad, promo, or whatever, go for it. I won't be back to fix the page. Don't have anymore time to waste with you or wikipedia. If folks google the rifle, the Armalite page will come up right with wiki at the top of google so no loss. Have a nice day.''' [[User:JohnC76\|JohnC76]] ([[User talk:JohnC76\|talk]]) 09:39, 14 January 2013 (UTC)