Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Yu Zhou: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
:
Quigley (talk | contribs)
comment
Line 23: Line 23:


:::I have analyzed your changes on the talk page in cases where I disagree, and you are welcome to go there if you would like to discuss further. And as long as the parties in disagreement can talk to each other, it seems quite unnecessary to suggest withdrawal of a nomination. It is unclear to me what you mean by "advocacy-esque," though I did note that you deleted most of the information sourced to Amnesty International, so perhaps that's it. I think Amnesty is a reputable and reliable source on human rights issues. Its statement that a person is "at risk of torture" doesn't constitute advocacy in my mind, so I think that content should remain. I do not support your choice to change the article name, but I won't contest it for now [[User:TheBlueCanoe|'''<span style="color:black">The</span><span style="color:green">Blue</span><span style="color:black">Canoe</span>''']] 12:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
:::I have analyzed your changes on the talk page in cases where I disagree, and you are welcome to go there if you would like to discuss further. And as long as the parties in disagreement can talk to each other, it seems quite unnecessary to suggest withdrawal of a nomination. It is unclear to me what you mean by "advocacy-esque," though I did note that you deleted most of the information sourced to Amnesty International, so perhaps that's it. I think Amnesty is a reputable and reliable source on human rights issues. Its statement that a person is "at risk of torture" doesn't constitute advocacy in my mind, so I think that content should remain. I do not support your choice to change the article name, but I won't contest it for now [[User:TheBlueCanoe|'''<span style="color:black">The</span><span style="color:green">Blue</span><span style="color:black">Canoe</span>''']] 12:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

::::I responded to you on the talk page, but I'm afraid a lot of our disagreements revolve around framing and intricate POV issues, which can take up pages of discussion and be inconclusive. (I hope, nonetheless, that our dialogue will prove an exception.) Here are some of the most egregious misrepresentations in the article which I removed, and all of which tilted in the direction of pro-Falun Gong advocacy in my view:
::::*As mentioned above, saying in Wikipedia's voice that Yu Zhou "was killed", when the only established fact is that he died in custody, officially from diabetic dehydration as a result of a hunger strike (a possibility without blame that is unexamined in this wording).
::::*The weaseley sentence in lead, "evidence of the Chinese government’s continued use of extralegal detention and torture" when the only mention of torture is AI's generic "urgent appeal!" that he was "at risk" of torture; your wording falsely implies that he was detained extralegally or that he was tortured
::::*Your stating as fact that Yu was taken "to the Tongzhou detention center" (when the cited sources just say that he "was detained" more generically), as a set up for later when Tongzhou would deny knowledge of him; it was Yu's lawyer who is the source of most of this information, and he is a ''paid advocate'' for the man.
::::This is not mentioning the more subtle issues like your partial quoting of Yu Zhou's sister and constant peppering the article with emotive words like "crusade" and "persecution" on which I could more easily assume good faith. An obvious rule of DYK is that articles must be stable, and if we can't agree on whether certain sentences should be included or not, we cannot feature the article. [[User:Shrigley|Shrigley]] ([[User talk:Shrigley|talk]]) 16:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:59, 14 January 2013

Yu Zhou

  • ... that in 2008, Chinese folk musician Yu Zhou died in the custody of Chinese authorities 10 days after being arrested for possessing Falun Gong literature?

Created by TheBlueCanoe (talk). Nominated by Rcej (talk) at 05:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Pretty much all online refs rehash the same story, which is summarized by the fairly neutral and interesting hook. The article is long enough and old enough. The only thing that I worry about is the article's neutrality. I fixed some pretty serious violations by closely adhering to the sources—for example, attributing certain claims to practitioners and their families rather than to human rights groups, which gave them a lot more credibility—but the article creator, who is not involved in this nomination, may try to fight to keep some of the advocacy-esque wording. If that happens, I'll pursue dispute resolution and recommend withdrawal of this nomination on grounds of stability. Shrigley (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
I have analyzed your changes on the talk page in cases where I disagree, and you are welcome to go there if you would like to discuss further. And as long as the parties in disagreement can talk to each other, it seems quite unnecessary to suggest withdrawal of a nomination. It is unclear to me what you mean by "advocacy-esque," though I did note that you deleted most of the information sourced to Amnesty International, so perhaps that's it. I think Amnesty is a reputable and reliable source on human rights issues. Its statement that a person is "at risk of torture" doesn't constitute advocacy in my mind, so I think that content should remain. I do not support your choice to change the article name, but I won't contest it for now TheBlueCanoe 12:33, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
I responded to you on the talk page, but I'm afraid a lot of our disagreements revolve around framing and intricate POV issues, which can take up pages of discussion and be inconclusive. (I hope, nonetheless, that our dialogue will prove an exception.) Here are some of the most egregious misrepresentations in the article which I removed, and all of which tilted in the direction of pro-Falun Gong advocacy in my view:
  • As mentioned above, saying in Wikipedia's voice that Yu Zhou "was killed", when the only established fact is that he died in custody, officially from diabetic dehydration as a result of a hunger strike (a possibility without blame that is unexamined in this wording).
  • The weaseley sentence in lead, "evidence of the Chinese government’s continued use of extralegal detention and torture" when the only mention of torture is AI's generic "urgent appeal!" that he was "at risk" of torture; your wording falsely implies that he was detained extralegally or that he was tortured
  • Your stating as fact that Yu was taken "to the Tongzhou detention center" (when the cited sources just say that he "was detained" more generically), as a set up for later when Tongzhou would deny knowledge of him; it was Yu's lawyer who is the source of most of this information, and he is a paid advocate for the man.
This is not mentioning the more subtle issues like your partial quoting of Yu Zhou's sister and constant peppering the article with emotive words like "crusade" and "persecution" on which I could more easily assume good faith. An obvious rule of DYK is that articles must be stable, and if we can't agree on whether certain sentences should be included or not, we cannot feature the article. Shrigley (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)