Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iland: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →Iland: forgot to sign |
|||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
::::http://www.eweek.com/storage-station/vizioncore-iland-to-provide-trans-atlantic-replication-service.html |
::::http://www.eweek.com/storage-station/vizioncore-iland-to-provide-trans-atlantic-replication-service.html |
||
::::http://virtualization.sys-con.com/node/1073828 |
|||
::::http://virtualization.sys-con.com/node/1073828 <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Flood6|Flood6]] ([[User talk:Flood6|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Flood6|contribs]]) 22:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
::::[[User:Flood6|Damian]] ([[User talk:Flood6|talk]]) 23:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:19, 24 January 2013
- Iland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Using full name:
- Iland Internet Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find any secondary sources to establish notability for this business. Jojalozzo 21:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
I disagree that iland is not notable enough. I will work on collecting articles to demonstrate iland's notability and present them here. I am an iland employee, but no hard feelings if a consensus develops to delete the article. Damian (talk) 00:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm neutral about the company and look forward to seeing what reliable secondary sources we can come up with. Since you are an employee, I assume you may know of or can find out about independent news stories that Google isn't picking up. Let me know if you have any questions about notability or reliable sources. Jojalozzo 01:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- Here are some of the better ones I have found so far:
- There are a couple that are probably right on line of acceptable sources. I think most of them are pretty solid, though. Damian (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- That's a good start. It would be a big help if you would filter out the blogs and press releases and highlight the non-self-published sources. Thanks. Jojalozzo 21:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- None of them were press releases or self-published, I removed any articles that were in blog format:
- That's a good start. It would be a big help if you would filter out the blogs and press releases and highlight the non-self-published sources. Thanks. Jojalozzo 21:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- There are a couple that are probably right on line of acceptable sources. I think most of them are pretty solid, though. Damian (talk) 19:42, 24 January 2013 (UTC)