Ridiculous: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Reverted 1 edit by SalvatoreDolce (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by ClueBot NG. (Reverting possible vandalism. False positive? Report it on my talk page ... |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Colorful Clown 3.jpg|thumb|This ridiculously small hat is extremely incongruous with this gentleman's head size and is extremely inferior to other hats for covering the head.|200px]] |
[[File:Colorful Clown 3.jpg|thumb|This ridiculously small hat is extremely incongruous with this gentleman's head size and is extremely inferior to other hats for covering the head.|200px]] |
||
The '''ridiculous''' is that which is |
The '''ridiculous''' is that which is highly [[congruence (disambiguation)|incongruous]] or [[wikt:inferior|inferior]], sometimes deliberately so to make people laugh or get their attention, and sometimes unintended so as to be considered laughable and earn or provoke [[ridicule]] and [[derision]]. It comes from the 1540s Latin "ridiculosus" meaning "laughable", from "ridiculus" meaning "that which excites laughter", and from "ridere" meaning "to laugh".<ref name=DC>[http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ridiculous Dictionary.com]</ref> "Ridiculous" is an adjective describing "the ridiculous". |
||
In common usage, "ridiculousness" is used as a synonym for [[absurdity]] or [[nonsense]].<ref>[http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonsensical Free Dictionary]</ref><ref>[http://dictionary.babylon.com/nonsense_(foolish%C2%B8_ridiculous%C2%B8_silly)/ Babyon Dictionary]</ref><ref>[http://thesaurus.com/browse/illogicality Thesaurus.com]</ref> Historic and technical usage of "absurdity" associates it with [[Validity|invalid]] argumentation and [[reasoning]]. Historic and technical usage of "nonsense" associates it with [[semantics]] and [[Meaning (linguistics)|meaning]]. While historic and technical usage of "ridiculous" associates it with laughter, superiority, deformity, and incongruity. ''[[Reductio ad absurdum]]'' is a [[valid]] method of [[argument]], while ''[[reductio ad ridiculum]]'' is invalid. Argument by [[invective]] declaration of ridiculous is invalid, while arguments involving declarations of nonsense may summarize a [[cogency|cogent]] semantic problem with lack or meaning or [[ambiguity]]. |
In common usage, "ridiculousness" is used as a synonym for [[absurdity]] or [[nonsense]].<ref>[http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonsensical Free Dictionary]</ref><ref>[http://dictionary.babylon.com/nonsense_(foolish%C2%B8_ridiculous%C2%B8_silly)/ Babyon Dictionary]</ref><ref>[http://thesaurus.com/browse/illogicality Thesaurus.com]</ref> Historic and technical usage of "absurdity" associates it with [[Validity|invalid]] argumentation and [[reasoning]]. Historic and technical usage of "nonsense" associates it with [[semantics]] and [[Meaning (linguistics)|meaning]]. While historic and technical usage of "ridiculous" associates it with laughter, superiority, deformity, and incongruity. ''[[Reductio ad absurdum]]'' is a [[valid]] method of [[argument]], while ''[[reductio ad ridiculum]]'' is invalid. Argument by [[invective]] declaration of ridiculous is invalid, while arguments involving declarations of nonsense may summarize a [[cogency|cogent]] semantic problem with lack or meaning or [[ambiguity]]. |
||
Revision as of 04:03, 29 January 2013
The ridiculous is that which is highly incongruous or inferior, sometimes deliberately so to make people laugh or get their attention, and sometimes unintended so as to be considered laughable and earn or provoke ridicule and derision. It comes from the 1540s Latin "ridiculosus" meaning "laughable", from "ridiculus" meaning "that which excites laughter", and from "ridere" meaning "to laugh".[1] "Ridiculous" is an adjective describing "the ridiculous".
In common usage, "ridiculousness" is used as a synonym for absurdity or nonsense.[2][3][4] Historic and technical usage of "absurdity" associates it with invalid argumentation and reasoning. Historic and technical usage of "nonsense" associates it with semantics and meaning. While historic and technical usage of "ridiculous" associates it with laughter, superiority, deformity, and incongruity. Reductio ad absurdum is a valid method of argument, while reductio ad ridiculum is invalid. Argument by invective declaration of ridiculous is invalid, while arguments involving declarations of nonsense may summarize a cogent semantic problem with lack or meaning or ambiguity.
Historically, the ridiculous was central to initial theories of humor and laughter as first put forth by philosopher Thomas Hobbes. It was used in psychosocial power struggles in the European court by reducing opponents to the ridiculous using ridicule. It is currently used in the theory of humor to create laughter, shock, parody, or satire. Reactions to the ridiculous have been studied in psychology for its effects on memory, attention, and attitude in social hierarchies. These studies have been applied to the theory of advertisement regarding attention, memory, and alleviation of preexisting negative attitudes toward products. The ridiculous is often contrasted with the sublime, one of extreme inferiority, the other of extreme superiority, and often one can suddenly move from one extreme state to the other.
Humor
History: Incongruity, the superiority theory of humor, and deformity
The ridiculous often has extreme incongruity (things that are not thought to belong next to each other) or inferiority, e.g., "when something that was dignified is reduced to a ridiculous position (here noting the element of the incongruous), so that laughter is most intense when we escape from a 'coerced solemnity'."[5][6] For Aristotle, we laugh at inferior or ugly individuals, because we feel a joy at being superior to them.[7] Socrates was reported by Plato as saying that the ridiculous was characterized by a display of self-ignorance.[8] Deformity was considered by some to be essential to the ridiculous.[9][10] Psychological theories of humor include the "incongruity theory" and the "superiority theory", the latter of which the philosopher Thomas Hobbes was an early proponent.[11][12][13] Hobbes claimed that laughter was either caused spontaneously, or by seeing a deformed thing to which one compares themselves and laugh as a form of self applause; "a sudden glory arising from sudden conception of some eminency in ourselves, by comparison of the infirmities of others." [10] The Right Reverend William Warburton, Lord Bishop of Gloucester said in the early 18th century that, "Nothing is ridiculous but what is deformed".[14] Using the ridiculous is a method in the theory of humor.[15]
Although common usage now considers "absurdity" to be synonymous with "ridiculousness", Hobbes discussed the two concepts as different, in that absurdity is viewed as having to do with invalid reasoning, as in Hobbes' Table of Absurdity, while ridiculousness has to do with laughter, superiority, ridicule, and deformity.
Native American Sacred Clown
The Sacred Clown (Heyókȟa) in some Native American culture uses the painfully ridiculous, and is believed to become closer to the gods by its primordiality.[16][17] Native American clowns are ridiculous in their contrary and rule breaking antics.[18] In the film Little Big Man, the sacred clown rides sitting backwards on his horse.[citation needed] Heyókȟa are thought of as being inconguously backwards-forwards, upside-down, or contrary in nature. This spirit is often manifest by doing things backwards or unconventionally—riding a horse backwards, wearing clothes inside-out, or speaking backwards. For example, if food were scarce, a Heyókȟa would sit around and complain about how full he was; during a baking hot heat wave a Heyókȟa would shiver with cold and put on gloves and cover himself with a thick blanket. Similarly, when it is 40 degrees below freezing he will wander around naked for hours complaining that it is too hot.[citation needed]
Parody and satire in social commentary
The ridiculous can use uses both physical and conceptual inferiority and incongruity of juxtaposition to create parody and satire.
In Candide, Voltaire parodies Leibnitz's argument for the existence of evil under a benign God using "ridiculous rationalizations of evil".[19] Leibnitz claimed that God is constrained by logic, and created the best of all possible worlds. After being reduced from a "dignified" state to its opposite, the optimistic Dr. Pangloss (representing Leibnitz) finds cause to consider his undignified position to be the best of all possible worlds, noting his own particular current happiness, which he argues could not have been attained without experiencing the atrocities in the previous narrative; his optimistic attitude is extremely incongruous with his experiences and extremely inferior undignified ultimate condition.[19]
In Stanley Kubrick's 2001, A Space Odyssey, apelike humans and their behavior are juxtaposed next to streamlined advanced technology with a highly avant garde score by composer György Ligeti; Ligeti also used ridiculous juxtaposition in his scores to create parody,[20] and this tool was frequently used by composer Peter Maxwell Davies. Director Andrei Tarkovsky used this method in Solaris to parody Kubrick's advanced and costly cinematic technology in 2001, and at the same time parody the backwardness of Tarkovsky's own Soviet Union, by filming the freeway from the front of a car, to duplicate Kubrick's advanced video feedback techniques; this ridiculous juxtaposition of the Soviet Solaris as a response to 2001, was further juxtaposed with the space race of the 1960s, having degenerated to a "space movie race" at the end of that decade.[21]
Deformity and incongruity in performance as social commentary, and lifestyle
Japanese Butoh Dance
Japanese Butoh uses both inconguity and deformity to created ridiculous dance performance and lifestyle; extreme movement methods that are highly inconguous with natural body movement in its dance and everyday lifestyle, as well as in its clothing, actions, costume and set design that is highly incongruous with societal norms, which often shock the audience or visitor, and are sometimes considered not only ridiculous, but incongruently "bizzare and beautiful" or "elegant and grotesque".[22][23]
Theatre of the Ridiculous
The Theatre of the Ridiculous uses highly incongruous stage settings and incongruous costumes such as cross dressing to disturb or create shock in the audience.[24]
Psychology: attention, memory, and attitudes
Psychologists have studied human response to the ridiculous and its effects on attention and memory.[25][26]
Advertising
The ridiculous is used in advertisement to manipulate attention and attitudes to products.[25][27]
Juxtaposition with the sublime
The ridiculous is sometimes contrasted to the sublime where something with one quality is thought of as approaching, or likely to change to, the other.
Thomas Paine, writing in The Age of Reason in 1795, said The sublime and the ridiculous are often so nearly related, that it is difficult to class them separately. One step above the sublime, makes the ridiculous; and one step above the ridiculous, makes the sublime again.[28]
Napoleon, reflecting on the state of his existence following his retreat from Moscow in 1812, famously remarked to Polish ambassador D. G. De Pradt: Du sublime au ridicule il n'y a qu'un pas (There is only one step from the sublime to the ridiculous).[1][28][29][30]
Invalid argument
Sometimes, the ridiclous is used to make an invalid argument.[31]
Reduction to the ridiculous, or "reductio ad ridiculum"
Reduction to the ridiculous (Latin: "reductio ad ridiculum", also called "Appeal to ridicule", "appeal to mockery", or "the Horse Laugh") is a logical fallacy which presents the opponent's argument in a way that grossly misrepresent it, and appears ridiculous next to it, often so misrepresentative as to creating a straw man argument, rather than addressing the argument itself.[31] For example, in arguing against idealism, with its sophisticated arguments that the world was not real but only existed in the mind, philosopher Dr. Johnson famously kicked a stone.[31]
Contrasting ridiculousness with absurdity in reasoning, Reductio ad ridiculum is an invalid method of, while reductio ad absurdum is a valid method.
Invective
Arguments are often simply dismissed by calling them "ridiculous" as an invective, without further argumentation.[31] Philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche often dismissed philosophical positions by calling them "ridiculous" without further argument given.[31]
See also
References
- ^ a b Dictionary.com
- ^ Free Dictionary
- ^ Babyon Dictionary
- ^ Thesaurus.com
- ^ Humour, Jokes and the Statement, Journal of Human Values, 2006, S Acharya, [1]
- ^ British Journal of Aesthetics, (1964) 4 (3), Harold Osborne, p.284
- ^ Poetics, 1449a, p. 34-35.
- ^ Plato, Philebus 49b ff.
- ^ Laughter as a Test of Truth in Enlightenment Satire, Werner von Koppenfels
- ^ a b A history of English Laughter: Laughter from Beowulf to Beckett and Beyond, Manfred Pfister
- ^ The Perception of Humor, Willibald Ruch, Emotions, qualia, and consciousness, Biocybernetics, VOl. 10
- ^ How Many Feminists Does It Take To Make A Joke? Sexist Humor and What's Wrong With It, Memo Bergmann, Hypatia, Vol.1, Issue 1, March 1986
- ^ Humor as a Double‐Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication, JC Meyer, Communication Theory, Volume 10, Issue 3, pages 310–331, August 2000
- ^ The divine legation of Moses demonstrated, William Warburton
- ^ Investigating the humor of gelotophobes: Does feeling ridiculous equal being humorless?, Humor - International Journal of Humor Research. Volume 22, Issue 1-2, Pages 111–143, ISSN (Online) 1613-3722, ISSN (Print) 0933-1719, doi:10.1515/HUMR.2009.006, /February/2009, Willibald Ruch, Ursula Beermann, [2]
- ^ Native American Postcolonial Psychology, E Duran, B Duran
- ^ Ambigere: The Euro-American Picaro and the Native American Trickster, Melus, The Society for the Study of the Multi-Ethnic Literature of the United States Vol. 17, No. 1, Spring 1991, F Ballinger
- ^ The Mythology of Evil Among North American Indian Yuroks and Its Implications for Western Spirituality , Anthropology of Consciousness, Volume 7, Issue 3, pages 15–29, September 1996, Royal Alsup, Stanley Krippne, [3]
- ^ a b "ridiculous rationalizations of evil". Teaching Candide-A Debate, The French Review, Vol 61, No. 5, 1988, Theodore E. D. Braun, Felicia Sturzer, Martine Darmon Meyer, [4]
- ^ Blending the Sublime and the Ridiculous: A Study of Parody in György Ligeti's Le Grand Macabre, Sewell, Amanda J, [5]
- ^ Sculpting in Time, Andrei Tarkovsky
- ^ The Bizarre World of Butoh, San Fransciso Weekly
- ^ The Bizzare and the Beautiful, Los Angeles Times, 1989
- ^ Conquest of the Ridiculous:Ronald Tavel, John Vaccaro and Charles Ludlam, WarholStars, [6]
- ^ a b The Psychology of Advertising, Walter Dill Scott, 1910
- ^ The Ancient Art of Memory: Usefulness in Treatment, Bernard M. Patten, Archives of Neurology, 1972;26(1):25-31, [7]
- ^ Music for advertising effects, Psychology and Marketing, Volume 1, Issue 3-4, 1984, S Hecker
- ^ a b Jennifer Speake, ed. (2009). "sublime". The Oxford Dictionary of Proverbs. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 2011-02-13. Available online to subscribers}}
- ^ The Columbia Dictionary of Quotations, Robert Andrews
- ^ British Journal of Aesthetics, Aesthetics (1964) 4 (3), Harold Osborne, p. 284-5, [8]
- ^ a b c d e Wishful Thinking and Other Philosophical Reflections, Nicholas Rescher, 2009 Cite error: The named reference "WT" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).