Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/INeverCry: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 26: Line 26:
:'''4.''' I have already supported and I don't think I am going to change my vote <u>unless something exceptional happens</u>. I am aware of your work (both here and Commons) for a few months now, and actually I was thinking to ask you to consider to have yourself nominated for adminship!<br/>My only question is, you are a Commons admin too, surely you can understand adminship in Wikipedia will bring extra workload! (yes, I know there are few editors who are admin in both Wikipedia and Commons) How'll you manage so much work? This is an unpaid work after all! I am quite sure, you have already thought of it and planned something! I am interested to learn your thoughts!
:'''4.''' I have already supported and I don't think I am going to change my vote <u>unless something exceptional happens</u>. I am aware of your work (both here and Commons) for a few months now, and actually I was thinking to ask you to consider to have yourself nominated for adminship!<br/>My only question is, you are a Commons admin too, surely you can understand adminship in Wikipedia will bring extra workload! (yes, I know there are few editors who are admin in both Wikipedia and Commons) How'll you manage so much work? This is an unpaid work after all! I am quite sure, you have already thought of it and planned something! I am interested to learn your thoughts!


;Additional questions from [[Special:Contributions/27.251.75.18|27.251.75.18]] ([[User talk:27.251.75.18|talk]]) 08:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
;Additional questions from [[Special:Contributions/27.251.75.18|27.251.75.18]] ([[User talk:27.251.75.18|talk]])
:'''5.''' You have mostly automated edits here. In past year you have identified only around 15 vandal edits. Also why would you call http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&diff=next&oldid=507333928 as vandalism? Why would you tag http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Becky_%28television_personality%29&diff=prev&oldid=501177814 as vandalism? Please tell.[[Special:Contributions/27.251.75.18|27.251.75.18]] ([[User talk:27.251.75.18|talk]]) 08:40, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
:'''5.''' You have mostly automated edits here. In past year you have identified only around 15 vandal edits. Also why would you call http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&diff=next&oldid=507333928 as vandalism? Why would you tag http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Becky_%28television_personality%29&diff=prev&oldid=501177814 as vandalism? Please tell.
::'''A:'''
::'''A:'''



Revision as of 08:41, 31 January 2013

INeverCry

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (2/0/0); Scheduled to end 08:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination

INeverCry (talk · contribs) – Hello English Wikipedia community. I am one of INeverCry's colleagues on Commons. Today I am delighted to nominate him for adminship here. INeverCry is a good contributor here with over 34000 edits and holds autopatrolled, filemover, rollbacker, reviewer rights. He has created 88 articles, writed 1 GA, 2 DYK. INeverCry is also an great admin on Commons with over 65000 edits and 50000 admin tasks in the last 6 months, which indicates that most of deletions are performed by him. I think he will work efficiently with files stuffs and transfer them to Commons when he has the mop. He has accepted my nomination here but I will leave him a message about this RfA on en.wiki. Thank all of you for your participation Morning Sunshine (talk) 05:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Co-nomination by Hahc21

I first came across INeverCry when my interest in free image and the policy about images arose last year. Since then, I have only been pleased by the successful work he does at Commons, and his impressive record here on the English Wikipedia. As an specialist in files, I believe that entrusting Cry with the tools will be more than a net positive for the project. he is a solid user with very much content and admin experience and, with our shortage of administrators recently, I am completely sure that the mop suits very well for many of the tasks and things he does. Therefore, I am honoured to present this co-nomination. — ΛΧΣ21 06:08, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I'm honored to accept this nomination. INeverCry 08:01, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
A: I'm interested in moving files to Commons. My primary activity on Commons is tagging and deleting copyvio images and handling deletion requests, and so I have alot of experience with image copyright. I would also be available to help with CSD. On Commons I delete a considerable number of test pages, vandalism pages and talkpages, user requested deletions, and promotional pages, and believe I could help with this here. I've performed about 400 blocks on Commons of vandals, copyright violaters, socks, etc, and so I could help with that. I participate quite a bit on the various admin notice boards on Commons, and could help here in that area. In my role as an admin on Commons I deal with alot of users questioning deletions or reporting vandalism and other problems to me, and I always deal with these questions in a calm, respectful manner. I would do the same here on Wikipedia. If given adminship here I'm willing to help where needed, and would look at other areas of admin action as I gain experience. I would also note that when I'm not sure about an issue or how to go about something, I ask other more experienced users or admins for advice.
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
A:My best single article is George Crabbe, which I plan to bring to GAN once and for all after I'm able to update it with the new 2004 bio of him. I also helped my friend User:Antiquary clean up and promote The Story of Sigurd the Volsung and the Fall of the Niblungs to GA. Mary Lamb is pretty good, as is James Hogg. I've done some work on Elizabeth Gaskell and Wilkie Collins, and I plan to do big expansions of both in the future. I usually work on Russian lit articles with my Russian friend User:Evermore2 like Nikolai Leskov and Aleksey Konstantinovich Tolstoy, and shorter ones like Georgy Adamovich. I've done some small ones of my own like Lidia Veselitskaya, and Maria Arbatova. I'm proud of the List of Russian-language writers too.

Aside from that, I've done alot of Wikiproject assessments, copyedits, other gnomish stuff, and I've created 71 writer navboxes.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A:I had a bit of a disagreement a few months ago with User:Dennis Brown over my reverting and warning an IP and his admonishing me about it. I had strong feelings about it, but the whole thing was handled in a respectful way by both of us. I do feel I over-reacted a bit though. I took some time off to think about it and I've taken it as a learning experience. Dennis and I have interacted a few times since then on Commons with no issues, and I would think he looks at it as water under the bridge just as I do. Other than that I'm usually very calm and collected no matter what the situation, and I do my best to be friendly and respectful with other editors. Over my 3 years of activity here, I've had a few minor arguments but nothiing else I'd call a conflict.
Additional questions from Tito Dutta
4. I have already supported and I don't think I am going to change my vote unless something exceptional happens. I am aware of your work (both here and Commons) for a few months now, and actually I was thinking to ask you to consider to have yourself nominated for adminship!
My only question is, you are a Commons admin too, surely you can understand adminship in Wikipedia will bring extra workload! (yes, I know there are few editors who are admin in both Wikipedia and Commons) How'll you manage so much work? This is an unpaid work after all! I am quite sure, you have already thought of it and planned something! I am interested to learn your thoughts!
Additional questions from 27.251.75.18 (talk)
5. You have mostly automated edits here. In past year you have identified only around 15 vandal edits. Also why would you call http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pussy_Riot&diff=next&oldid=507333928 as vandalism? Why would you tag http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Becky_%28television_personality%29&diff=prev&oldid=501177814 as vandalism? Please tell.
A:

General comments


Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.

Discussion

Support
  1. Strong support: Excellent candidate! --Tito Dutta (talk) 08:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support experienced on Commons, and I've seen the candidate make insightful comments on the English Wikivoyage as well, so I'm sure they can understand the differences in local policies. --Rschen7754 08:36, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Oppose


Neutral