Jump to content

User talk:62.219.148.12: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Declined.
Line 27: Line 27:


Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. &nbsp;<small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #A00000;padding:1px;"> An [[User:Optimist on the run|'''<span style="color:#A00000">optimist'''</span>]] on the [[User Talk:Optimist on the run|''<span style="color:#00A000">run!''</span>]] </small> 15:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)}}
Please read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] for more information. &nbsp;<small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #A00000;padding:1px;"> An [[User:Optimist on the run|'''<span style="color:#A00000">optimist'''</span>]] on the [[User Talk:Optimist on the run|''<span style="color:#00A000">run!''</span>]] </small> 15:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|Just how dense are you? Or is everything here being ran by bots, the so-called blocks and appeals as well? I was editing MY OWN USER PAGE. It cannot be vandalism because IT BELONGS TO ME. You and your bots undoing my edits ARE the vandals. Your block and this farce, ridiculous, and callous "debate" are the sole reason and proof I could ever require for not wanting to have a user page here any longer. When other people touch your pages you cry vandalism and threaten with bans, but then you dare come into MY userpage and mess with it...hypocrisy abound!}}

Revision as of 21:21, 1 February 2013

Behold: The big mighty troll kids of Wikipedia terrorize a person for editing his own user page. How pathetic this place is.


January 2013

Hello, I'm Thingg. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to User:Ori Klein, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Thingg 23:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to User:Ori Klein, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Torreslfchero (talk) 12:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Ori Klein with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Torreslfchero (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Ori Klein with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Torreslfchero (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is my user page and I shall do with it as I deem fit.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Alexf(talk) 12:59, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.219.148.12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It. Is. My. Own. God. Damn. User. Page. It is /you/ who are the vandals! 62.219.148.12 (talk) 13:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.   An optimist on the run! 15:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

62.219.148.12 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Just how dense are you? Or is everything here being ran by bots, the so-called blocks and appeals as well? I was editing MY OWN USER PAGE. It cannot be vandalism because IT BELONGS TO ME. You and your bots undoing my edits ARE the vandals. Your block and this farce, ridiculous, and callous "debate" are the sole reason and proof I could ever require for not wanting to have a user page here any longer. When other people touch your pages you cry vandalism and threaten with bans, but then you dare come into MY userpage and mess with it...hypocrisy abound!

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Just how dense are you? Or is everything here being ran by bots, the so-called blocks and appeals as well? I was editing MY OWN USER PAGE. It cannot be vandalism because IT BELONGS TO ME. You and your bots undoing my edits ARE the vandals. Your block and this farce, ridiculous, and callous "debate" are the sole reason and proof I could ever require for not wanting to have a user page here any longer. When other people touch your pages you cry vandalism and threaten with bans, but then you dare come into MY userpage and mess with it...hypocrisy abound! |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Just how dense are you? Or is everything here being ran by bots, the so-called blocks and appeals as well? I was editing MY OWN USER PAGE. It cannot be vandalism because IT BELONGS TO ME. You and your bots undoing my edits ARE the vandals. Your block and this farce, ridiculous, and callous "debate" are the sole reason and proof I could ever require for not wanting to have a user page here any longer. When other people touch your pages you cry vandalism and threaten with bans, but then you dare come into MY userpage and mess with it...hypocrisy abound! |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Just how dense are you? Or is everything here being ran by bots, the so-called blocks and appeals as well? I was editing MY OWN USER PAGE. It cannot be vandalism because IT BELONGS TO ME. You and your bots undoing my edits ARE the vandals. Your block and this farce, ridiculous, and callous "debate" are the sole reason and proof I could ever require for not wanting to have a user page here any longer. When other people touch your pages you cry vandalism and threaten with bans, but then you dare come into MY userpage and mess with it...hypocrisy abound! |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}