User talk:JohnC76: Difference between revisions
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
________________________________________________________________________ |
________________________________________________________________________ |
||
'''What exactly was copyright issues with the last edit. I rewrote the last entry in my own words. It was not the same as the copyvio flagged content at all. It was simply facts in my words that I know if this rifle. PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!!!!''' |
'''What exactly was copyright issues with the last edit. I rewrote the last entry in my own words. It was not the same as the copyvio flagged content at all. It was simply facts in my words that I know if this rifle. PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!!!!''' |
Revision as of 14:07, 8 February 2013
Welcome
|
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
or
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! Have a nice day!
Well done for removing the previous copyvio stuff, but the article still needs major work:
- What the hell does "veturbulencecoil" mean?
- The article is still heavily promotional, you really, really need to tone that down, and enough people have warned you about that.
- One of your references is in an odd format and thus displays inoorrectly.
- 3rd-party, reliable sources are required: at present, the only sources present are either directly from Armalite, or are press-release style things.
- I'm not sure the videos in the See Also belong there. Certainly not with the current wording. At the very most, they should be in External Links, but probably shouldn't be there at all.
- There are too many pictures for the article at present: either put them into a gallery format, or prune them. They also need captions. In addition, one needs to go in the infobox.
- I suggest you take pointers from other weapons articles and use them to improve the article. Lukeno94 (talk) 11:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Armalite AR-50. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:Armalite AR-50/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 14:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
________________________________________________________________________
What exactly was copyright issues with the last edit. I rewrote the last entry in my own words. It was not the same as the copyvio flagged content at all. It was simply facts in my words that I know if this rifle. PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!!!!