Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark pattern: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
start discussion |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Dark pattern}}) |
:({{Find sources|Dark pattern}}) |
||
Neologism whose point-of-origin is the grad student author's website. As far as I can ascertain all in-context references to notion trace back to promotion of this term. There are as one might expect a large number of false hits for things like camouflage, but no legitimate book hits whatsoever. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
Neologism whose point-of-origin is the grad student author's website. As far as I can ascertain all in-context references to notion trace back to promotion of this term. There are as one might expect a large number of false hits for things like camouflage, but no legitimate book hits whatsoever. [[User:Mangoe|Mangoe]] ([[User talk:Mangoe|talk]]) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' per nom. Article's author hasn't responded to the suggestion that notability be supported by reliable sources, rather than sites with which he's connected [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=539044202], which underscores the impression that this was developed with promotional intent. [[Special:Contributions/99.136.254.88|99.136.254.88]] ([[User talk:99.136.254.88|talk]]) 15:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:46, 19 February 2013
- Dark pattern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neologism whose point-of-origin is the grad student author's website. As far as I can ascertain all in-context references to notion trace back to promotion of this term. There are as one might expect a large number of false hits for things like camouflage, but no legitimate book hits whatsoever. Mangoe (talk) 15:38, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Article's author hasn't responded to the suggestion that notability be supported by reliable sources, rather than sites with which he's connected [1], which underscores the impression that this was developed with promotional intent. 99.136.254.88 (talk) 15:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC)