User talk:ClueBot Commons

The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the [edit] link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.

Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.

Please change the parameters under which your program operates.

What so-called "clue" did your bot think made this a non-constructive edit. I think it's over-reaching its ambit as a bot, and become harmful to Wikipedia with actions like this. 209.94.191.126 (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but complaining here doesn't help, especially when you don't actually cite the edit you are complaining about. If you believe ClueBot NG has registered a false positive, the best way to influence the bot's future behavior is to report it at the ClueBot NG Report Interface. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 19:13, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

I believe the IP is referring to this revert. I don't know enough about the subject to know if it was a good revert... ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Make a comment!} 21:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

It is actually a false positive (IP was noting a matter of English variation) and I left a message on their talk suggesting they report it as the template mentions. Yngvadottir (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Eduardo Lopes's Page

Where are the references to unreliable sources?
Kind Regards,
Eduardo Lopes
Seigokan Australia (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.30.97.242 (talk) 11:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)