Talk:Alexander zu Dohna-Schlobitten (1899–1997): Difference between revisions
HerkusMonte (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Factually incorrect- Somebody who does not understand the scenario or the Geneva convention wrote that Dohna refused to sign the order against the men who were properly in uniform because it would violate the Geneva convention. There are TWO problems with that. First, the men were dressed as Italian civilians, they were not in uniform and thus they were not under the protection of the Geneva Convention. Secondly, they were operating as partisans/spies and they had no legal protection under the Geneva Convention. We can only speculate as to Dohna's motives for not signing the execution order. The 15 men were unlawful combatants/spies/partisans and were legally executed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.140.85.63|99.140.85.63]] ([[User talk:99.140.85.63|talk]]) 20:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Factually incorrect- Somebody who does not understand the scenario or the Geneva convention wrote that Dohna refused to sign the order against the men who were properly in uniform because it would violate the Geneva convention. There are TWO problems with that. First, the men were dressed as Italian civilians, they were not in uniform and thus they were not under the protection of the Geneva Convention. Secondly, they were operating as partisans/spies and they had no legal protection under the Geneva Convention. We can only speculate as to Dohna's motives for not signing the execution order. The 15 men were unlawful combatants/spies/partisans and were legally executed. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/99.140.85.63|99.140.85.63]] ([[User talk:99.140.85.63|talk]]) 20:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:Dohna describes the events in his memoirs: The men were dressed in uniforms and that's why he refused to sign the order. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte|talk]]) 08:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC) |
:Dohna describes the events in his memoirs: The men were dressed in uniforms and that's why he refused to sign the order. [[User:HerkusMonte|HerkusMonte]] ([[User talk:HerkusMonte|talk]]) 08:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
Dohna is lying |
|||
Time Magazine FROM THE TIME, states that the men wore NO insignia and that while they had field jackets they were turned inside out and thus they appeared to be civilians. They were not fighting openly in marked uniforms. The Geneva convention requires that a combatant wear his uniform and bear insignia from the nation/organization/group/band/etc that he is serving. |
|||
Monday, Oct. 22, 1945 |
|||
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,778442,00.html |
Revision as of 05:32, 27 February 2013
Biography Unassessed | |||||||
|
Factually incorrect- Somebody who does not understand the scenario or the Geneva convention wrote that Dohna refused to sign the order against the men who were properly in uniform because it would violate the Geneva convention. There are TWO problems with that. First, the men were dressed as Italian civilians, they were not in uniform and thus they were not under the protection of the Geneva Convention. Secondly, they were operating as partisans/spies and they had no legal protection under the Geneva Convention. We can only speculate as to Dohna's motives for not signing the execution order. The 15 men were unlawful combatants/spies/partisans and were legally executed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.140.85.63 (talk) 20:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Dohna describes the events in his memoirs: The men were dressed in uniforms and that's why he refused to sign the order. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Dohna is lying
Time Magazine FROM THE TIME, states that the men wore NO insignia and that while they had field jackets they were turned inside out and thus they appeared to be civilians. They were not fighting openly in marked uniforms. The Geneva convention requires that a combatant wear his uniform and bear insignia from the nation/organization/group/band/etc that he is serving.
Monday, Oct. 22, 1945
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,778442,00.html