User talk:MadeYourReadThis: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2009/April; 2009/March; 2009/May; 2009/June; 2009/July; 2009/August; 2009/September; 2009/October; 2009/November; 2009/December; 2010/January; 2010/February; 2010/March; 2010/April; 2010/May; 2010/June; 2010/July; 2010/August; 2010/September; 2010/October; 2010/November; 2010/December; 2011/January; 2011/February; 2011/March; 2011/April; 2011/May; 2011/June; 2011/July; 2011/August; 2011/September; 2011/October; 2011/November; 2011/December; 2012/January; 2012/February; 2012/March; 2012/April; 2012/May; 2012/June; 2012/July; 2012/August; 2012/September; 2012/October; 2012/November; 2012/December; 2013/January; 2013/February; 2013/March; 2013/April; 2013/May; 2013/June; 2013/July; 2013/August; 2013/September; 2013/October; 2013/November; 2013/December; 2014/January; 2014/February; 2014/March; 2014/April; 2014/May; 2014/June; 2014/July; 2014/August; 2014/September; 2014/November; 2014/December; 2015/January; 2015/February; 2015/March; 2015/April; 2015/May; 2015/June; 2015/July; 2015/August; 2015/September; 2015/October; 2015/November; 2015/December; 2016/January; 2016/February; 2016/April; 2016/May; 2016/June; 2016/July; 2016/August; 2016/September; 2016/October; 2016/November; 2016/December; 2017/January; 2017/February; 2017/March; 2017/April; 2017/May; 2017/July; 2017/September; 2017/October; 2017/November; 2017/December; 2018/January; 2018/February; 2018/March; 2018/April; 2018/June; 2018/July; 2018/August; 2018/September; 2018/October; 2018/November; 2018/December; 2019/February; 2019/April; 2019/May; 2019/June; 2019/July; 2019/August; 2019/September; 2019/October; 2019/November; 2019/December; 2020/January; 2020/February; 2020/March; 2020/April; 2020/May; 2020/June; 2020/July; 2020/August; 2020/September; 2020/October; 2020/November; 2020/December; 2021/January; 2021/February; 2021/March; 2021/April; 2021/May; 2021/July; 2021/August; 2021/September; 2021/October; 2021/November; 2022/January; 2022/February; 2022/April; 2022/May; 2022/June; 2022/July; 2022/August; 2022/September; 2022/October; 2022/November; 2022/December; 2023/January; 2023/February; 2023/March; 2023/April; 2023/May; 2023/June; 2023/July; 2023/August; 2023/September; 2023/October; 2023/November; 2023/December; 2024/January; 2024/February; 2024/March; 2024/April; 2024/May; 2024/June;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:41, 17 March 2013

This user is one of the 250 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

I am not an admin, I'm an editor like you. I did not delete your page and I cannot restore it. Look at the history on the page to find the admin who deleted the article and ask them to restore the article to your account and they nearly always will.

If you are here to comment on an article I've marked for deletion or some other edit I've made, please do but explain yourself and why you feel it was inappropriate. Comments that include specific Wikipedia policies, guidelines, or even explain more completely will receive my full attention as they demonstrate that you likely dont stand alone in your point of view and have put more effort into it than just griping.

Please keep in mind that I've been volunteering here a while and am familiar with notability guidelines for academicians, corporations, music, books and particularly for articles involving radio stations and spaceflight. Responses will probably include links to those guidelines.

I'm happy to answer requests for help. I'm happy to answer vague questions from new editors. I'm happy to answer specific questions from anyone (admins and other experienced editors should not need to post vague questions). Before you vandalize my talk or user page, let me save you the trouble, yes I am an idiot.--RadioFan (talk) 21:48, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Click here to leave a message for me. Don't forget to sign your message with ~~~~ and include the page title you are talking about

Review of new article on William Dana Orcutt

Thanks for reviewing my submission of a new article on William Dana Orcutt. I believe that this subject does meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Nonetheless I have added additional material and sources to my draft article and marked it for re-submission. As I understand the guidelines, multiple sources can be combined (as I have done) to demonstrate that a subject is notable and that a subject "need not be the main topic of the source material." I would welcome any help you wish to provide in terms of reviewing my article again, suggesting further changes, and helping to add this subject to Wikipedia. Thanks again Trevormunoz (talk) 21:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick additional review and article creation Trevormunoz (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:10, 17 March 2013 edit Trevormunoz (talk \| contribs) 115 edits →‎Review of new article on William Dana Orcutt: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:41, 17 March 2013 edit undo Trevormunoz (talk \| contribs) 115 edits →‎Review of new article on William Dana Orcutt Next edit →
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Thanks for reviewing my submission of a new article on [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Dana Orcutt\|William Dana Orcutt]]. I believe that this subject does meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Nonetheless I have added additional material and sources to my draft article and marked it for re-submission. As I understand the guidelines, multiple sources can be combined (as I have done) to demonstrate that a subject is notable and that a subject "need not be the main topic of the source material." I would welcome any help you wish to provide in terms of reviewing my article again, suggesting further changes, and helping to add this subject to Wikipedia. Thanks again [[User:Trevormunoz\|Trevormunoz]] ([[User talk:Trevormunoz\|talk]]) 21:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)		Thanks for reviewing my submission of a new article on [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Dana Orcutt\|William Dana Orcutt]]. I believe that this subject does meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Nonetheless I have added additional material and sources to my draft article and marked it for re-submission. As I understand the guidelines, multiple sources can be combined (as I have done) to demonstrate that a subject is notable and that a subject "need not be the main topic of the source material." I would welcome any help you wish to provide in terms of reviewing my article again, suggesting further changes, and helping to add this subject to Wikipedia. Thanks again [[User:Trevormunoz\|Trevormunoz]] ([[User talk:Trevormunoz\|talk]]) 21:10, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

			Thanks for the quick additional review and article creation [[User:Trevormunoz\|Trevormunoz]] ([[User talk:Trevormunoz\|talk]]) 22:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)