User talk:EncMstr: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:38, 29 March 2013

My admin actions
Contribs • Blocks • Protects • Deletions
Admin links
Noticeboard • Incidents • AIV • 3RR
Backlog • Prod • AfD • Autoblocks
Arbitration
Arbitration • Noticeboard • Enforcement
Checkuser
RFCU • Clerks page • Checkuser
Abusive Hosts • VCN proxycheck • ippages
Multi-RBL lookup • DNSstuff
• Wannabe Kate's tool • Prefix index

Archives

through March 2007 • March 2007 through March 2008 • March 2008 through July 2008 • July 2008 through March 2009 • March 2009 through January 2011 • January 2011 through present

This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Blush Thanks for removing that {{reflist}}!

In High-voltage direct current.

Block

Why did you block me (user:Banan14kab) simply because I did not use edit summaries? I forget often and I make quick obvious edits that can be seen in the history... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.58.203.123 (talk) 22:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did it to get your attention. Now that I have it, please try providing an edit summary for at least half your edits. An edit summary greatly helps those who review edits in the Recent Changes log, article history, and user contributions. Vandals commonly provide no edit history, so it is usually fruitful for edit reviewers to closely inspect edits lacking a summary. Please see WP:EDITSUMMARY for more. Consistently failing to provide edit summaries, especially after having been warned before is disruptive editing, which is the basis of your block. I'll unblock you now. Happy editing! —EncMstr (talk) 23:26, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Page semi-protection

What do you think of semi-protecting the Oregon article again? Looking at the page history is pretty brutal. Jsayre64 (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to be well below the threshold for protection with only 12 vandal attacks in February, with one good edit by an IP editor. There are 262 editors watching the article and it is reflected by the usually speedy reversions. All but two reverts occurred within a minute of vandalism; the two reverts occurred in 2 minutes 49 seconds and 2 minutes 45 seconds.

As always, I keep a close eye on it. If it receives prolonged heavy vandalism, I'll protect it. —EncMstr (talk) 05:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EncMstr, kill yourself

TUSC token 9971e50bd95eab9f57319ec9a0d97086

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account where I changed my password!

Ostroski, again

He's back - creating templates in phony Talk page articles - see:

Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 05:52, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done: pages deleted and IP blocked Thanks. —EncMstr (talk) 05:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey EncMstr; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 :It looks to be well below the threshold for protection with only 12 vandal attacks in February, with one good edit by an IP editor.  There are 262 editors watching the article and it is reflected by the usually speedy reversions.  All but two reverts occurred within a minute of vandalism; the two reverts occurred in 2 minutes 49 seconds and 2 minutes 45 seconds.
 :As always, I keep a close eye on it.  If it receives prolonged heavy vandalism, I'll protect it.   —[[user:EncMstr|EncMstr]] ([[user talk:EncMstr|talk]]) 05:55, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
+EncMstr, kill yourself
 == TUSC token 9971e50bd95eab9f57319ec9a0d97086 ==