Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASSAR: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:39, 29 March 2013

ASSAR

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails notability criteria per WP:ORG and WP:GNG -- and includes WP:HOAX material. It appears to be only one person's website (built by the article's creator), all text is sourced to and copied from that single website, and a search found no independent reliable sources. Furthermore, the creator tries to pass off online sources which are entirely unrelated to topic but merely share the name "Assar" (for example, a paper by Ahmed N. Assar, an exhibit by the Assar Art Gallery in Iran, a book by the Assar Architect Group of Brussels, etc.) — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails to meet WP:ORG and more likely a promotion. Most references are WP:Primary. Dejakh~talk!•Contributions/Dejakh 19:32, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete It definitely sounds like promotion but promotion of 'Humanity' and if Wikipedia is defined as a voluntary association of humanitarians working to develop a common resource of human knowledge, there is no point of deleting such valuable article WP:NPOV that showing a way to prevent Human Rights in ASIA by people itself. Instead of depending on secondary sources Wikipedians who are knowledgeable enough to challenge, discuss, elaborate, suggest improvements to bring in on Wikipedia standards. Asian-Social-Editor (talk) 10:30, 28 March 2013 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

Speedy Delete copyright issues and not fit to be on Wikipedia Uncletomwood (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Uncletomwood, I see that the source website states its material is licensed under CC-BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL which means there is no copyright issue and doesn't qualify for G12 speedy deletion. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 17:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks like a promotional crap with no reliable sources. Salih (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Eligible for Speedy Delete Agreed with CactusWriter contents on source website are under Sharealike 3.0 Unported License CC-BY-SA 3.0 and free from copyright issues and can be used anywhere without consent. I tried searching independent media materials about ASSAR's founder and have included some articles published in local media as reference.Asian-Social-Editor (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Critical Issues with this article is this that it is being written on a research done by a Human Right's Defender & RTI Activist from Asia and attacks on HRD & RTI Activists in Asia is very frequent and they are grass root protectors of human rights but often they often act alone, moved by anger at corruption and other illegal activities without coming in media notice due to their security reasons. They receive media attention only when killed or seriously injured. According to Secondary or tertiary sources on Wikipedia itself more than 143 HRD & RTI activists were killed & assaulted in India only in last 6 years which makes it obvious that such activist prefer no publicity of their work in local media & tertiary sources.Attacks on RTI activists in India Asian-Social-Editor (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Secondary or tertiary sources citation issue of this article is attracting critics because the nature of research done is not categorised as of now in Asia which has been adequately explained in its para Criticism. Please read this again before taking a biased decision to delete it. It looks like WP:OR Original research written in form of WP:NOT PAPER may appear like promotion without Secondary or tertiary but its promoting a cause WP:PROMOTION of Human Knowledge and values related to Human Rights not promoting any person or organisation. Asian-Social-Editor (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC) -->[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 *'''Delete'''. Looks like a promotional crap with no reliable sources. <span style="">[[User:Salih|<font style="color:#e90;">Salih</font>]] [[User talk:Salih|(<font style="color:#08c;">talk</font>)]]</span> 15:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
-*'''Not Eligible for Speedy Delete''' Agreed with [[CactusWriter]] contents on source website are free from copyrights and can be used anywhere without consent. I tried searching independent media materials about ASSAR's founder and have included some articles published in local media as reference.
+*'''Not Eligible for Speedy Delete''' Agreed with [[CactusWriter]] contents on source website are under Sharealike 3.0 Unported License [[CC-BY-SA 3.0]] and free from copyright issues and can be used anywhere without consent. I tried searching independent media materials about ASSAR's founder and have included some articles published in local media as reference.[[User:Asian-Social-Editor|Asian-Social-Editor]] ([[User talk:Asian-Social-Editor|talk]]) 20:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
-*'''Critical Issues''' with this article is this that it is being written on a research done by a Human Right's Defender & RTI Activist from [[Asia]] and attacks on HRD & RTI Activists in Asia is very frequent and they are grass root protectors of human rights but often they often act alone, moved by anger at corruption and other illegal activities without coming in media notice due to their security reasons. They receive media attention only when killed or seriously injured. According to Secondary or tertiary sources on Wikipedia itself more than 143 HRD & RTI activists were killed & assaulted in India only in last 6 years which makes it obvious that such activist prefer no publicity of their work in local media & tertiary sources.
+*'''Critical Issues''' with this article is this that it is being written on a research done by a Human Right's Defender & RTI Activist from [[Asia]] and attacks on HRD & RTI Activists in Asia is very frequent and they are grass root protectors of human rights but often they often act alone, moved by anger at corruption and other illegal activities without coming in media notice due to their security reasons. They receive media attention only when killed or seriously injured. According to Secondary or tertiary sources on Wikipedia itself more than 143 HRD & RTI activists were killed & assaulted in India only in last 6 years which makes it obvious that such activist prefer no publicity of their work in local media & tertiary sources.[[Attacks on RTI activists in India]] [[User:Asian-Social-Editor|Asian-Social-Editor]] ([[User talk:Asian-Social-Editor|talk]]) 20:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
-*'''Secondary or tertiary sources''' citation issue of this article is attracting critics because the nature of research done is not categorised as of now in Asia which has been adequately explained in its para '''Criticism'''. Please read this again before taking a biased decision to delete it.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Asian-Social-Editor|Asian-Social-Editor]] ([[User talk:Asian-Social-Editor|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Asian-Social-Editor|contribs]]) 20:14, 29 March 2013 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+*'''Secondary or tertiary sources''' citation issue of this article is attracting critics because the nature of research done is not categorised as of now in Asia which has been adequately explained in its para '''Criticism'''. Please read this again before taking a biased decision to delete it. It looks like [[WP:OR]] Original research  written in form of [[WP:NOT PAPER]] may appear like promotion without Secondary or tertiary but its promoting a cause [[WP:PROMOTION]] of Human Knowledge and values related to Human Rights not promoting any person or organisation. [[User:Asian-Social-Editor|Asian-Social-Editor]] ([[User talk:Asian-Social-Editor|talk]]) 20:39, 29 March 2013 (UTC) -->