Talk:Bancor: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 108.192.6.10 - "→Milton Friedman section: new section" |
→neturality needs to be kept in the article: new section |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.192.6.10|108.192.6.10]] ([[User talk:108.192.6.10|talk]]) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.192.6.10|108.192.6.10]] ([[User talk:108.192.6.10|talk]]) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== neturality needs to be kept in the article == |
|||
This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. [[Special:Contributions/174.46.28.58|174.46.28.58]] ([[User talk:174.46.28.58|talk]]) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:08, 22 April 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bancor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Numismatics Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Economics Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Whoo-boy. Somebody needs to edit this article for spelling errors, but I don't understand the subject matter enough to want to stick my nose into it. Rcarlberg (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Milton Friedman section
Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.6.10 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
neturality needs to be kept in the article
This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)