Jump to content

Talk:Bancor: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 108.192.6.10 - "→‎Milton Friedman section: new section"
Line 8: Line 8:


Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.192.6.10|108.192.6.10]] ([[User talk:108.192.6.10|talk]]) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.192.6.10|108.192.6.10]] ([[User talk:108.192.6.10|talk]]) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== neturality needs to be kept in the article ==

This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. [[Special:Contributions/174.46.28.58|174.46.28.58]] ([[User talk:174.46.28.58|talk]]) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:08, 22 April 2013

WikiProject iconNumismatics Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEconomics Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Whoo-boy. Somebody needs to edit this article for spelling errors, but I don't understand the subject matter enough to want to stick my nose into it. Rcarlberg (talk) 20:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Milton Friedman section

Why is this section even in here? It has nothing to do with the bancor as a concept and seems like a literal copy paste from either the Friedman page, the Keynes page or one of the articles dealing with Keynesian or monetarist economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.192.6.10 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

neturality needs to be kept in the article

This article has in the past strayed away from describing the subject and into promoting it as an idea. The article should not unilaterally be making a case for bancor. It should not present subjective histories of the Bretton Woods conference. It should not present a long section that promotes only points of view in favor of bancor. 174.46.28.58 (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]