Jump to content

Talk:Doppelganger (Marvel Comics): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Add WikiProject Fictional Characters
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* I see a new category was added to this article. How is Doppelganger a precognitive character? Unless I missed something, he's not. -[[User:Seinfreak37|Seinfreak37]] 15:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
* I see a new category was added to this article. How is Doppelganger a precognitive character? Unless I missed something, he's not. -[[User:Seinfreak37|Seinfreak37]] 15:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
** Edit: unless you count his physic link to Demogoblin as Clairvoyance, I guess ... -[[User:Seinfreak37|Seinfreak37]] 16:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
** Edit: unless you count his physic link to Demogoblin as Clairvoyance, I guess ... -[[User:Seinfreak37|Seinfreak37]] 16:00, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

[[Special:Contributions/69.114.203.203|69.114.203.203]] ([[User talk:69.114.203.203|talk]]) 22:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC):There was a cameo of him in Spider-Man:The Animated Series when Harry Osborn was having crazy dreams.Though,he didn't have 6 arms or pointy fingers.


Doesn't he have spider-sense like Spider-man? [[Special:Contributions/68.166.64.212|68.166.64.212]] ([[User talk:68.166.64.212|talk]]) 08:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't he have spider-sense like Spider-man? [[Special:Contributions/68.166.64.212|68.166.64.212]] ([[User talk:68.166.64.212|talk]]) 08:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:33, 6 May 2013

WikiProject iconComics: Marvel Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
WikiProject iconFictional characters Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Fictional precognitive characters?

69.114.203.203 (talk) 22:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC):There was a cameo of him in Spider-Man:The Animated Series when Harry Osborn was having crazy dreams.Though,he didn't have 6 arms or pointy fingers.[reply]

Doesn't he have spider-sense like Spider-man? 68.166.64.212 (talk) 08:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I read on the Ultimate Spider-Man (story arcs) page that a six armed Spider-Man clone is seen in the latest issue of the Ultimate Clone Saga, I've been wondering if this could be a reference to Doppelganger. -- Lord Crayak

I think not. That character only has six arms as a reference to the fact that he appears in ish 100 - just as the 616 spidey grew 6 arms in 'Amazing Spider-Man' 100.

Gender

I notice that this page refers to Doppleganger as a "he", in any of the comics Doppleganger appeared in, was he ever reffered to with a masculine pronoun? BassxForte 19:53, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He is a doppelganger of a male, so it is reasonable to refer to him as male. --Freak104 19:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Maximum Carnage, several characters including Spiderman, Carnage, Shriek, and Demogoblin referred to the Doppleganger by masculine pronouns such as "he" or "him." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.96.238 (talk) 19:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carnage #1

Even if the Doppelganger's return doesn't explain how it survived being eviscerated by Carnage, if it could survive that, a few bullets aren't likely to kill it, so the "possibly killing it" should be removed. 173.180.72.42 (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. You were correct to remove that, but not because of your stated reason. Statements like "possibly killing" would be classified under original research and shouldn't be in the article. Thanks for removing that. I failed to catch it before now. Spidey104 15:27, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]