User talk:Chaser: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:34, 29 May 2006

Note to posters: Let's try to keep conversations together and easily readable. If you post to my talk page, I will just reply here. If I posted recently to another talk page, including your talk page, then that means I have it on my watchlist and will just read responses there. Thanks. Kchase02 (T) I just sent a message to a dozen people that included the sentence "Enjoy your memorial day!" I really didn't put much thought into the fact that the holiday commemorates fallen soldiers. I'm sorry if I offended anyone.

Welcome!

Hello, Chaser, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! And thanks for your great work adding the Justices to Supreme Court case articles! BDAbramson T 19:15, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ambidextrous people

You tagged this as an article for deletion. As a category, it should however go to WP:CFD. Lambiam ^Talk 01:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intro at Opus Dei: "created"/"founded"

Hi. Thanks for your comment. I based the principles behind the wording on Pedro Rodriguez, et al,'s work Opus Dei in the Church 1994. He said there that Opus Dei is a "self-development" of the Church, a theological or ecclesiological statement referring to the church as a whole, i.e. hierarchy and laypeople...the communion. So the word "created" refers, broadly and theologically, to all the Catholics have done to set it up-- from Escriva (Catholic priest who "founded" it, a term confirmed by the Pope John Paul II), his followers (Catholics), the hierarchy who supported him (Catholic bishops), up to John Paul II (Pope representing the entire Church) who gave the legal "dress", the prelature. Thus, after the statement on being "created", there is another statement specifying the meaning of the general term "created": that is was "founded" by Escriva and "established" by JP II. Now, from a more canonical viewpoint, the term "created" can also refer more strictly to the "erection" of Opus Dei as personal prelature done by John Paul II. The word "creation" is more understandable in the English-speaking world. I hope this helps. Marax 07:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Zishman360

The user removed your afd tag, though in this case it may make sense to stick with speedy; it's already been deleted several times, and doesn't have a prayer in AFD. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 23:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases

If the project is sleeping my advice is to wake it up! Make it your own - find people who work on SCOTUS cases and message them to get involved (or re-involved) in the project! As for the infoboxes, those really are more friendly to lawyers than lay persons, but we should also strive for consistency. Mention your concern to Postdlf, as he has been most involved in them, and start a conversation on the topic on the aforementioed project's talk page. Cheers! BDAbramson T 13:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing on AFD

You more-or-less did so already, but if you just write "I'd like to withdraw the nomination" or something similar, that should do it. -Hit bull, win steak 18:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's best to let the closing admin take care of that. -Hit bull, win steak 18:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I led you astray, but it's been closed, so all's well that ends well. The stub looks good. -Hit bull, win steak 20:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

jandany

regarding your remark on my user page. i think you misunderstood what i wrote or maybe i didnt explain myslef clearly enough. --Greece666 22:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox US Supreme Court Case

Ok, it's more or less done. What do you think? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 23:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Penrod

Hi, I deprodded this an userfied it. You can be bold and just do that kind of thing yourself... but if you want something to end up with some other fate than deletion, WP:PROD really isn't the best way to go about it, because it always ends in deletion. I'm going to mark the redirect for speedy deletion now. Cheers! Mango juice^talk 20:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Home and Away page recreations

Hey. How are you

Well that' enough small talk.

You seem to be recreating pages for Home and Away characters that were deleted per an AfD debate.

With that, I didn't realise there was that Afd Debate. It's amazing what you learn. Anyway, if I did know I wouldn't have started what I did. The main reason was that I felt that the main cast (former and current) needed their own history. I was naively hoping someone would extend what I started because judging by the amount of people who watch the show and come on here the histories would have extended. That and well if some "dumb" programmes have individual character pages then why not H&A.

Such content is eligible for speedy deletion, and I doubt you'll find any editor who agrees with you marking these changes as minor.

My bad. My profile keeps the minor edit ticked and sometime when I "untick" it it still gets ticked so I basically 1) gave up caring about the tickbox and 2) forget to untick it when I start a new page.

Need to know anything else?

D-Man

Talk: Boxipuss

This page does appear in yahoo and if you took more time before jumping to a conclusion you might of realised that it was up for deletion but then was unselected following a discussion. If you want some evidence I recomend you to talk to User Porge. I am also not stating the Boxipuss ever exist however it is for sure a popular myth throughout Malaysia. Yours Sincerely --Dr. Alan Sieve 07:39, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hypno-Chip Article

Hypno-Chip can't be it's own article, but Energo sword and Wash'n'Roll can? Dr Archeville 19:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did merge Hypno-Chip rather quickly after you created it. It might merit a stand-alone if it had more content, IMHO. Were you planning on adding more? I wouldn't object to recreating the page if you're going to expand upon it. As to the other articles you mentioned, I didn't notice them when I merged Hypno-Chip. Seeing them now, I'd say that the Energo Sword article could be safely merged into Dinobots, but the Wash'n'Roll article better stands alone. --Kchase02 (T) 19:41, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clamydoselachiformes

It is O.K. to keep. Some scientists use it normally.

User:Jntg4

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Kchase02! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe 's talk 17:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof

First of all download this zip, it contains all necessary files, and then the program itself. Computerjoe 's talk 08:42, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

I notcied that you've left messages for Zappa.jake on his talk page, so I thought you mihgt want to vote in his RfA at WP:RFA. ShortJason 15:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Oppose #5 --Kchase02 (T) 16:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for ShortJason's advertising. Normally most people consider it unacceptable to advertise RfAs (Requests for Adminship) on people's talk pages. I have asked him to stop here. Regardless, now that it's here, if you do wish to vote, do so here. Sorry, zappa.jake (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding deletion of article on N.Nagaraja (M.T.B.)

I would like to comment on what RHaworth has told regarding MTB Nagaraj. Please go to google search and type in MTB Nagaraj you will get latest information about him. B.N.BacheGowda has been defeated in the 2004 Assembly election in Hoskote Constituency which comes under Bangalore District North. But Mr.RHaworth Sir has told that a web page has mentioned that B.N.BacheGowda has won, yes it is true but it was in 1999 Assembly election and not in 2004 assembly election as said by the author. And Regarding leaving space after fullstop it will be corrected and I am sorry for the same. I hope now the things will be cleared.

From, Netgir_Netgir

@@ Line 90: / Line 90: @@
 :I did. Oppose #5 --[[User:Kchase02|Kchase02]] ([[User_talk:Kchase02|T]]) 16:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 :I apologize for ShortJason's advertising.  Normally most people consider it unacceptable to advertise RfAs (Requests for Adminship) on people's talk pages.  I have asked him to stop [[User talk:ShortJason#Advertising my RfA|here]].  Regardless, now that it's here, if you do wish to vote, do so [[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Zappa.jake|here]].  Sorry, [[User:Zappa.jake|zappa.jak]]<font color="green">[[User:Zappa.jake/templates/esperanza|e]]</font> ([[User_talk:Zappa.jake|talk]]) 19:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
+== Regarding deletion of article on N.Nagaraja (M.T.B.) ==
+I would like to comment on what RHaworth has told regarding MTB Nagaraj. Please go to google search and type in MTB Nagaraj you will get latest information about him. B.N.BacheGowda has been defeated in the 2004 Assembly election in Hoskote Constituency which comes under Bangalore District North. But Mr.RHaworth Sir has told that a web page has mentioned that B.N.BacheGowda has won, yes it is true but it was in 1999 Assembly election and not in 2004 assembly election as said by the author. And Regarding leaving space after fullstop it will be corrected and I am sorry for the same. I hope now the things will be cleared.
+From,
+Netgir_Netgir