Talk:Pollutant Standards Index: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:36, 23 June 2013

Template:SG

Environment Unassessed

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Proposed Merge

Please visit Talk:Pollutants Standards Index to contribute to the discussion of the proposed merge. --Dweller 14:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should the haze situation in Singapore be included?

This is an article about the PSI, not about the haze situation. Should things such as the availability of masks or the stop-work order be included in the article?

Also, the Singapore part of the article changes abruptly from the general PSI usage to the 2013 haze situation specifically. This does not seem like it belongs here, and should be moved to somewhere more suitable. Maybe here? Silvermael (talk) 06:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Makes a lot of sense. I've moved the part about the masks to that new article. --115.42.147.243 (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the same token, I've moved a bulk of text about the haze situation to the new article. Itemsmono (talk) 07:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The entire article on the haze in Singapore should be moved over to the new article and any current information should be deleted. The article covers on PSI but majority of the information is on Singapore and Malaysia. How about information on the United States's PSI? fireblaster_lyz 09:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireblaster lyz (talk • contribs)

The Singapore section is written with a very conspiratorial tone. This can be misconstrued or misused as an official source supporting a "PSI cover-up" conspiracy. I find this to run counter to Wikipedia's neutrality. 103.11.50.3 (talk) 02:36, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:25, 22 June 2013 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,553,629 edits m Signing comment by Fireblaster lyz - "→Should the haze situation in Singapore be included?: " ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:36, 23 June 2013 edit undo 103.11.50.3 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:The entire article on the haze in Singapore should be moved over to the [[2013_Southeast_Asian_haze\|new article]] and any current information should be deleted. The article covers on PSI but majority of the information is on Singapore and Malaysia. How about information on the United States's PSI? fireblaster_lyz 09:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fireblaster lyz\|Fireblaster lyz]] ([[User talk:Fireblaster lyz\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fireblaster lyz\|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		:The entire article on the haze in Singapore should be moved over to the [[2013_Southeast_Asian_haze\|new article]] and any current information should be deleted. The article covers on PSI but majority of the information is on Singapore and Malaysia. How about information on the United States's PSI? fireblaster_lyz 09:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Fireblaster lyz\|Fireblaster lyz]] ([[User talk:Fireblaster lyz\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Fireblaster lyz\|contribs]]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			:The Singapore section is written with a very conspiratorial tone. This can be misconstrued or misused as an official source supporting a "PSI cover-up" conspiracy. I find this to run counter to Wikipedia's neutrality. [[Special:Contributions/103.11.50.3\|103.11.50.3]] ([[User talk:103.11.50.3\|talk]]) 02:36, 23 June 2013 (UTC)