User talk:Lakata: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:02, 23 June 2013

June 2013

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Swami Maheshwarananda without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:03, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Swami Maheshwarananda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Swami Maheshwarananda, you may be blocked from editing. Pratyya ^(Hello!) 05:38, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear anyone, the section (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Maheshwarananda#Media_Reports_on_Sexual_Abuse) is removed, because still there are no real facts that support these published allegations. Otherwise it is only spreading of slander. Lakata (talk) 07:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I ask everyone, please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia regarding the section (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Maheshwarananda#Media_Reports_on_Sexual_Abuse), especially if it involves living persons. Still there are no real facts that support these published allegations at the level of "a lady said that...". Otherwise it is only spreading of slander. No one has been charged with a crime or convicted. This dishonest edit is contrary to Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people even with the principles fairness at all. Thank you. Lakata (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I very much appreciate understanding Wikipedia´s Administrators who temporarily blocked the disreputable content because of the suspected sources. Thank you. Lakata (talk) 07:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your WP:AIV filing. Content disputes do not belong there. Specific WP:BLP-violating issues belong at WP:BLPN, but you'll need to file your report properly, and ensure it is policy-based (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lakata. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 [[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px|alt=Warning icon]] I ask everyone, please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia regarding the section (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swami_Maheshwarananda#Media_Reports_on_Sexual_Abuse), especially if it involves living persons. Still there are no real facts that support these published allegations at the level of "a lady said that...". Otherwise it is only spreading of slander. No one has been charged with a crime or convicted. This dishonest edit is contrary to Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people even with the principles fairness at all. Thank you. [[User:Lakata|Lakata]] ([[User talk:Lakata#top|talk]]) 13:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
+I very much appreciate understanding Wikipedia´s Administrators who temporarily blocked the disreputable content because of the suspected sources. Thank you. [[User:Lakata|Lakata]] ([[User talk:Lakata#top|talk]]) 07:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 :: I have removed your [[WP:AIV]] filing.  Content disputes do not belong there.  Specific [[WP:BLP]]-violating issues belong at [[WP:BLPN]], but you'll need to file your report properly, and ensure it is policy-based ([[User talk:Bwilkins|✉→]]<span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">[[User:Bwilkins|BWilkins]]</span>[[Special:Contributions/Bwilkins|←✎]]) 10:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)