User talk:Seppi333: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:14, 25 June 2013

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Seppi333! Thank you for your contributions. I am Way2veers and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Way2veers 02:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amphetamine & Adult working memory

I'm going to go ahead and just find the study and use that as a source. However, it's actually Wikipedia policy that it's better to use a secondary news source reporting on a study than it is to use the study itself. I'm not sure why this is the case, but I remember someone linking it to me after I made the same point you just did on my user page. Also, it's almost always better to try to fix something yourself or to leave the almost-sufficient version in place (after commenting about it in the talk page) than it is to delete it. Thanks. Exercisephys (talk) 22:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

False accusation of vandalism

Please retract this inappropriate accusation of vandalism. I see you are a new editor, which may well explain your misunderstanding of the meaning of "vanadalism". Please note that accusing a good-faith contributor of vandalism is a personal affront to an editor's integrity. Please read WP:NOT VANDALISM. Thank you. :) 81.157.7.7 (talk) 10:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your interest in improving the article and that section; however, piecewise deletion of non-supporting material of a specific viewpoint along with re-casting and mis-citing the results of academic research only hurts wikipedia. You did bring to my attention the specific policy on primary sources though, so I've tried to address your issues w.r.t. wp:npov by disassociating it from the context of test-taking. Seppi333 (talk) 10:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate accusations of vandalism are not good. Please redact (eg, like this: ~~vandalism~~). 81.157.7.7 (talk) 11:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:56, 25 June 2013 edit Seppi333 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors 35,325 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:14, 25 June 2013 edit undo 81.157.7.7 (talk) →False accusation of vandalism: please redact Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	I appreciate your interest in improving the article and that section; however, piecewise deletion of non-supporting material of a specific viewpoint along with re-casting and mis-citing the results of academic research only hurts wikipedia. You did bring to my attention the specific policy on primary sources though, so I've tried to address your issues w.r.t. [[wp:npov]] by disassociating it from the context of test-taking. [[User:Seppi333\|Seppi333]] ([[User talk:Seppi333#top\|talk]]) 10:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)		I appreciate your interest in improving the article and that section; however, piecewise deletion of non-supporting material of a specific viewpoint along with re-casting and mis-citing the results of academic research only hurts wikipedia. You did bring to my attention the specific policy on primary sources though, so I've tried to address your issues w.r.t. [[wp:npov]] by disassociating it from the context of test-taking. [[User:Seppi333\|Seppi333]] ([[User talk:Seppi333#top\|talk]]) 10:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

			:Inappropriate accusations of [[WP:VANDAL\|vandalism]] are not good. Please redact (eg, like this: <strike>vandalism</strike>). [[Special:Contributions/81.157.7.7\|81.157.7.7]] ([[User talk:81.157.7.7\|talk]]) 11:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)