User:EdwardsBot/Spam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:51, 3 July 2013

# KEY

0562

# RECIPIENTS (PAGE LIST)

Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send

# SUBJECT

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter

# BODY

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Newsletters/Quarter 3, 2013/Delivery}} ~~~~~

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 # KEY
 # RECIPIENTS (PAGE LIST)
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 # SUBJECT
+WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter
-WikiCup 2013 June newsletter
 # BODY
+{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Amusement Parks/Newsletters/Quarter 3, 2013/Delivery}} ~~~~~
-We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.
-Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Figureskatingfan}} claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on [[Wikipedia:Featured topics/Maya Angelou|topics related to Maya Angelou]], the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Ealdgyth}} was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article [[Middle Ages]] and 102 points for her good article [[Battle of Hastings]]. Good articles [[James Chadwick]] and [[Stanislaw Ulam]] netted {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Hawkeye7}} 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Piotrus}} for each of [[Władysław Sikorski]] and [[Emilia Plater]], both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Casliber}} and {{Wikipedia:WikiCup/Participant4|Sasata}} being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on ''[[Boletus luridus]]''.
-A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round ''after'' the break, but ''not'' the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews]]. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiCup]], and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! <small>If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from [[Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send]].</small> [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]] • [[Special:Emailuser/J Milburn|email]]) and [[User:The ed17|The ed17]] ([[User talk:The ed17|talk]] • [[Special:Emailuser/The ed17|email]]) ~~~~~
 </source>