User talk:203.81.67.123: Difference between revisions
→July 2013: decline |
question |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Can someone explain this? I am not aware of any [[Wikipedia:IPs are human too|malicious edits]] from this ip. [[Special:Contributions/203.81.67.123|203.81.67.123]] ([[User talk:203.81.67.123#top|talk]]) 10:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC) | decline=This address is being used as a proxy and they get blocked. There have been no attempts at outing...no personal info has been disclosed. <br /> — [[User:Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">Berean Hunter</span>]] [[User talk :Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">(talk)</span>]] 03:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)}} |
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Can someone explain this? I am not aware of any [[Wikipedia:IPs are human too|malicious edits]] from this ip. [[Special:Contributions/203.81.67.123|203.81.67.123]] ([[User talk:203.81.67.123#top|talk]]) 10:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC) | decline=This address is being used as a proxy and they get blocked. There have been no attempts at outing...no personal info has been disclosed. <br /> — [[User:Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">Berean Hunter</span>]] [[User talk :Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">(talk)</span>]] 03:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)}} |
||
:Thanks for your review, [[User:Berean Hunter|Berean]]. I've been asking around for some feedback on this, to try to figure out the reason for the block, and it seems that most IPs are proxies, but confirmed proxies are legitimate, so the "confirmed proxy" doesn't seem to be the issue. Perhaps there is something in the edits that raises some issue. All the edits in the "user contributions" are mine, going back to July 1. They were made in good faith, there were good reasons for making them, and I stand by them. If there is something problematic about any of them, perhaps you could point it out to me. Regards, —[[Special:Contributions/203.81.67.123|203.81.67.123]] ([[User talk:203.81.67.123#top|talk]]) 13:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Perhaps it was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=564310224&oldid=564309457 this edit] that [[user:Toddst1|Toddst1]] finds objectionable, and doens't like being criticized for calling a [[Asperger syndrome|disabled]] kid's edits "nonsense" and "detritus" and accusing the kid of "cowardice". I see that the kid, [[user:Badanagram|Badanagram]], has just been indeffed by Toddst1, also without a warning. [[Special:Contributions/203.81.67.123|203.81.67.123]] ([[User talk:203.81.67.123#top|talk]]) 12:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Hi Toddst1! I see you have just [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:203.81.67.123&diff=564500533&oldid=564499592 made an additional post about] the address of this IP. I consider such attempts to identify my address or contact information as [[WP:OUTING]], and without confirming or denying the accuracy of the information, I would appreciate if someone could revdelete it. [[Special:Contributions/203.81.67.123|203.81.67.123]] ([[User talk:203.81.67.123#top|talk]]) 13:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
|||
I see Toddst1 has now [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Badanagram&diff=564465418&oldid=564464891 posted] a template with the explanation of why this Badanagram account has just been indeffed. Apparently it has to do with an IP that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.11.254.79 hasn't edited since November 2010]. [[Special:Contributions/203.81.67.123|203.81.67.123]] ([[User talk:203.81.67.123#top|talk]]) 13:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:43, 18 July 2013
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
![]() |
July 2013
![]() | This account has been blocked for a period as a Confirmed proxy server and a sock puppet used to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using multiple IPs and proxy servers for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 05:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC) |
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- Um, would someone mind explaining what that was about? 203.81.67.123 (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
203.81.67.123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can someone explain this? I am not aware of any malicious edits from this ip. 203.81.67.123 (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This address is being used as a proxy and they get blocked. There have been no attempts at outing...no personal info has been disclosed.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 03:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Thanks for your review, Berean. I've been asking around for some feedback on this, to try to figure out the reason for the block, and it seems that most IPs are proxies, but confirmed proxies are legitimate, so the "confirmed proxy" doesn't seem to be the issue. Perhaps there is something in the edits that raises some issue. All the edits in the "user contributions" are mine, going back to July 1. They were made in good faith, there were good reasons for making them, and I stand by them. If there is something problematic about any of them, perhaps you could point it out to me. Regards, —203.81.67.123 (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)