Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moad Gouzrou: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:
::Mouad, can you refrain from voting here like you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mouad_Gouzrou before]? [[WP:COI]] thanks --[[User:Tachfin|Tachfin]] ([[User talk:Tachfin|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
::Mouad, can you refrain from voting here like you did [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mouad_Gouzrou before]? [[WP:COI]] thanks --[[User:Tachfin|Tachfin]] ([[User talk:Tachfin|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
*I haven't yet looked into notability, but must point out that the "youngest Moroccan journalist" claim is incapable of being substantiated, whatever tabloid headline writers might say. There is no generally accepted definition of "journalist", and I'm sure that no reliable source keeps a list of all journalists and their dates of birth to allow us to check that there is no younger journalist. It is also implausible that nobody born after 1993 has written articles for publication in Morocco. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moad_Gouzrou&diff=566157487&oldid=566135676 removed this claim] from the article with an explanation but was reverted without explanation by [[User:Wikifan115|Wikifan115]]. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 21:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
*I haven't yet looked into notability, but must point out that the "youngest Moroccan journalist" claim is incapable of being substantiated, whatever tabloid headline writers might say. There is no generally accepted definition of "journalist", and I'm sure that no reliable source keeps a list of all journalists and their dates of birth to allow us to check that there is no younger journalist. It is also implausible that nobody born after 1993 has written articles for publication in Morocco. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moad_Gouzrou&diff=566157487&oldid=566135676 removed this claim] from the article with an explanation but was reverted without explanation by [[User:Wikifan115|Wikifan115]]. [[User:Phil Bridger|Phil Bridger]] ([[User talk:Phil Bridger|talk]]) 21:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

'''Weak keep''': I can't see where is the COI, can anyone argue ? Does the initial administrators who accepted the article not aware of Wikipedia guidelines ?

Revision as of 09:32, 31 July 2013

Moad Gouzrou

Moad Gouzrou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet notability criteria & WP:COI.

Article has been created by the subject himself with clear promotional intent; in yet another attempt to have his name on wikipedia [1]

No substantial coverage in media; only anecdotal references for this newbie freelance web writer, should be a speedy really. Tachfin (talk) 20:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Wikipedia guidelines are respected including clear secondary sources. That's not to say that the article was initially approved by Wikipedia administrators themselves. Thank you ! --Wikifan115 (talk) 23:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A journalist and radio producer of the first order, with many years of important responsibilities on a national network. No reason to delete the article (but to improve it, though). --41.141.203.229 (talk) 09:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mouad, can you refrain from voting here like you did before? WP:COI thanks --Tachfin (talk) 19:06, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I haven't yet looked into notability, but must point out that the "youngest Moroccan journalist" claim is incapable of being substantiated, whatever tabloid headline writers might say. There is no generally accepted definition of "journalist", and I'm sure that no reliable source keeps a list of all journalists and their dates of birth to allow us to check that there is no younger journalist. It is also implausible that nobody born after 1993 has written articles for publication in Morocco. I removed this claim from the article with an explanation but was reverted without explanation by Wikifan115. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep: I can't see where is the COI, can anyone argue ? Does the initial administrators who accepted the article not aware of Wikipedia guidelines ?