Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheMetallican: Difference between revisions
Adding new report for Gunmetal Angel. (TW) |
|||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
This user named Gunmetal Angel's confirmed sock was an IP. I looked at the IP and I do notice I made an edit on the same page he made, [[Waking the Cadaver]], however, I'm ''not'' him. First off, I don't edit metal articles that much. I mostly edit punk, emo, etc. However, I do know that band. But if you look at his contrib, he posted on the talk page saying they aren't deathcore which is a genre they are associated with and he then added slam death metal to the article and I restored deathcore since that was the sourced genre and slam isn't really a wiki genre anyways. Why would I be a sock if I undo what he did? The gunmetal angel user seems to be a metal editor, much more editing on metal than I do. |
|||
[[User:Kznn11|Kznn11]] ([[User talk:Kznn11|talk]]) 23:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:36, 19 August 2013
Gunmetal Angel
- Gunmetal Angel (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
19 August 2013
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Same IP range, same articles, same commenting style, same geolocation, same concern (band type/genre). Most recently (other) used IPs were blocked as socks just a few days ago. This is probably just one more. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 21:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Blocked 1 week. Please relist if you find more.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 22:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've placed a 3 month block on the /20 range. Elockid (Talk) 22:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've also place a 6 month block on 69.232.152.0/24. Elockid (Talk) 22:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
19 August 2013
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Same articles, etc. Just range blocked; didn't take, I guess. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 22:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note /22 rangeblocked for 6 months. Elockid (Talk) 22:58, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
19 August 2013
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Kznn11 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Genre changes, same articles, same m/o, just created account a few days ago, seems to know an awful lot about Wikipedia even with the first edit. Recently rangeblocked, is possibly using this previously created account to evade the IP rangeblock. Just edited an article the blocked IP did a short time ago. Conicidence? I don't think so. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 23:31, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user named Gunmetal Angel's confirmed sock was an IP. I looked at the IP and I do notice I made an edit on the same page he made, Waking the Cadaver, however, I'm not him. First off, I don't edit metal articles that much. I mostly edit punk, emo, etc. However, I do know that band. But if you look at his contrib, he posted on the talk page saying they aren't deathcore which is a genre they are associated with and he then added slam death metal to the article and I restored deathcore since that was the sourced genre and slam isn't really a wiki genre anyways. Why would I be a sock if I undo what he did? The gunmetal angel user seems to be a metal editor, much more editing on metal than I do.
Kznn11 (talk) 23:36, 19 August 2013 (UTC)