User talk:GabrielF: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:GabrielF/Archives/2013/September. (BOT) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Your edits to mel sembler page == |
== Your edits to mel sembler page == |
||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[ |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[Mel Sembler]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. [[WP:ADMINS|Administrators]] have the ability to [[WP:BLOCK|block]] users from editing if they repeatedly engage in [[WP:vandalism|vandalism]]. Once again, you have deleted well sourced content spuriously claiming the source to be unreliable. I know I should always assume good faith, but given how you behaved last time... in any case i restored the text in question.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Snertking|Snertking]] ([[User talk:Snertking|talk]]) 05:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:55, 13 September 2013
Please create a new section at the bottom so that your comments can be picked up by the archive bot.
Your edits to mel sembler page
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mel Sembler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Once again, you have deleted well sourced content spuriously claiming the source to be unreliable. I know I should always assume good faith, but given how you behaved last time... in any case i restored the text in question. Snertking (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)