Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chitwanix OS: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:00, 9 October 2013

Chitwanix OS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

New software (released last month) with no sign of WP:NOTABILITY yet. Only 85 ghits, most generated by the creators, or databases of software. Only one gnews hit, a passing mention. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As nom said, there's virtually nothing out there about the topic. The current article references only the company, plus what appears to be a company video on Youtube.--Larry (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Excuse me guys, Hello, The page Chitwanix_OS is an article of an Open Source Software as we are not writing any type of promotion activities or vulgar activities, this page must not be deleted. As the page is under construction, you made us very depressed psychologically in how to improve the article, so I request you to get the page approved and not be deleted thank you --Pyasi.arun (talk) 07:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC) Arun Kumar[reply]

Comment: The problem here is not promotion, but rather a lack of notability. Wikipedia is not a place to establish notability; we only include subjects whose claims to notability have been supported by a number of independent, reliable sources - see WP:RS. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 12:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Thank You for suggesting me guys, I appreciate your comment and I have a conclusion what I learned from you guys is that, I need to provide you the sources for the article, isn't it?. And the source can be a website right?. As, I am a member of developer team I alone can also be a source, but if you need the reliable source i.e. our official site. Our site is underconstruction and all the information will be also included there throughly with 24 hours. So, please approve the page and lets not delete the page. Please give me permission to remove the tag.--Pyasi.arun (talk) 15:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * '''Keep''' - Excuse me guys, Hello, The page Chitwanix_OS is an article of an Open Source Software as we are not writing any type of promotion activities or vulgar activities, this page must not be deleted. As the page is under construction, you made us very depressed psychologically in how to improve the article, so I request you to get the page approved and not be deleted thank you --[[User:Pyasi.arun|Pyasi.arun]] ([[User talk:Pyasi.arun|talk]]) 07:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC) [[User:Pyasi.arun|Arun Kumar]]
 :'''Comment''': The problem here is not promotion, but rather a lack of notability. Wikipedia is not a place to establish notability; we only include subjects whose claims to notability have been supported by a number of independent, reliable sources - see [[WP:RS]]. [[User:HMSSolent|<font color="blue">'''hmssolent'''</font>]]\<sup>[[User talk:HMSSolent|<font color="brown">''You rang?''</font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/HMSSolent|<font color="green">ship's log</font>]]</sub> 12:29, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
+:'''Comment''': Thank You for suggesting me guys, I appreciate your comment and I have a conclusion what I learned from you guys is that, I need to provide you the sources for the article, isn't it?. And the source can be a website right?. As, I am a member of developer team I alone can also be a source, but if you need the reliable source i.e. our official site. Our site is underconstruction and all the information will be also included there throughly with 24 hours. So, please approve the page and lets not delete the page. Please give me permission to remove the tag.--[[User:Pyasi.arun|Pyasi.arun]] ([[User talk:Pyasi.arun|talk]]) 15:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)