Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Golden jackal: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:24, 14 October 2013

Golden jackal

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 23 Oct 2013 at 08:10:49 (UTC)

Reason: High quality and high EV. Good lighting and nice posture.
Articles in which this image appears: Golden jackal, Syrian jackal
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Вых Пыхманн

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 08:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - Don't quite like the lighting. Shadows are poorly positioned. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. While this is a fine picture, I don't really agree that the lighting is "good" as given in the blurb, and in fact to me the lighting seems the weakest aspect. 86.151.119.149 (talk) 02:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support as creator --Вых Пыхманн (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * '''Support as nominator''' --[[User:Tomer T|Tomer T]] ([[User talk:Tomer T|talk]]) 08:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * '''Weak oppose''' - Don't quite like the lighting. Shadows are poorly positioned.&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 11:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
+:::I agree. While this is a fine picture, I don't really agree that the lighting is "good" as given in the blurb, and in fact to me the lighting seems the weakest aspect. [[Special:Contributions/86.151.119.149|86.151.119.149]] ([[User talk:86.151.119.149|talk]]) 02:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * '''Support as creator''' --[[User:Вых Пыхманн|Вых Пыхманн]] ([[User talk:Вых Пыхманн|talk]]) 18:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 <!-- additional votes go above this line  -->