Talk:Greenpeace Arctic Sunrise ship case: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
added wikiproject template, comment |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:That is not a proper motivation. [[User:Fentener van Vlissingen|Fentener van Vlissingen]] ([[User talk:Fentener van Vlissingen|talk]]) 19:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
:That is not a proper motivation. [[User:Fentener van Vlissingen|Fentener van Vlissingen]] ([[User talk:Fentener van Vlissingen|talk]]) 19:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
::It's also not a proper explanation. ''How'' is it not neutral? Is it biased in favour of Russia, or Greenpeace, or something else? If no further explanation is forthcoming, the {{tl|POV}} template should be removed. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 12:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC) |
::It's also not a proper explanation. ''How'' is it not neutral? Is it biased in favour of Russia, or Greenpeace, or something else? If no further explanation is forthcoming, the {{tl|POV}} template should be removed. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 12:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC) |
||
::: The article is clearly biased in favor of Greenpeace. The Russian point-of-view is ignored. Material not pertinent is included (burglary of Greenpeace office in Murmansk), while assault and battery of Russian diplomat in the Netherlands in front of his children is not mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/84.23.155.84|84.23.155.84]] ([[User talk:84.23.155.84|talk]]) 20:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 20:28, 26 October 2013
 | Russia Unassessed | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
This is not a neutral article.
- That is not a proper motivation. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- It's also not a proper explanation. How is it not neutral? Is it biased in favour of Russia, or Greenpeace, or something else? If no further explanation is forthcoming, the {{POV}} template should be removed. Robofish (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- The article is clearly biased in favor of Greenpeace. The Russian point-of-view is ignored. Material not pertinent is included (burglary of Greenpeace office in Murmansk), while assault and battery of Russian diplomat in the Netherlands in front of his children is not mentioned. 84.23.155.84 (talk) 20:28, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- It's also not a proper explanation. How is it not neutral? Is it biased in favour of Russia, or Greenpeace, or something else? If no further explanation is forthcoming, the {{POV}} template should be removed. Robofish (talk) 12:15, 17 October 2013 (UTC)