User talk:65.190.64.197: Difference between revisions
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Hi. For some months now, you've been editing [[Longview Baptist Temple]] and other editors have been rolling back your changes. This isn't fun for anybody. Why don't you discuss your views on the [[Talk:Longview Baptist Temple|article talk page]] so that we can some to some consensus? Thanks, --[[User:William Pietri|William Pietri]] 17:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC) |
Hi. For some months now, you've been editing [[Longview Baptist Temple]] and other editors have been rolling back your changes. This isn't fun for anybody. Why don't you discuss your views on the [[Talk:Longview Baptist Temple|article talk page]] so that we can some to some consensus? Thanks, --[[User:William Pietri|William Pietri]] 17:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
Why do you allow the tripe from Spurgen to remain? |
|||
Revision as of 00:54, 12 June 2006
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Vengeful Cynic 15:39, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Could you please either justify or stop your continual removal/attack of critics on Longview Baptist Temple --Vengeful Cynic 22:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi! I understand that you are not familiar with Wikipedia's process, and so you may be making mistakes out of ignorance. Regardless, your behavior with regards to the Longview Baptist Temple page is inappropriate. Please stop, or you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. For more information on how to participate, you might read Wikipedia's 5 pillars. --William Pietri 01:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi. For some months now, you've been editing Longview Baptist Temple and other editors have been rolling back your changes. This isn't fun for anybody. Why don't you discuss your views on the article talk page so that we can some to some consensus? Thanks, --William Pietri 17:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Why do you allow the tripe from Spurgen to remain?