Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Smolović (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Talain (talk | contribs)
Cicimau (talk | contribs)
Line 11: Line 11:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople|list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sportspeople|list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet the applicable notability guidelines.--[[User:Talain|Talain]] ([[User talk:Talain|talk]]) 17:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. Doesn't meet the applicable notability guidelines.--[[User:Talain|Talain]] ([[User talk:Talain|talk]]) 17:36, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
In replay to [[User:Cloudz679|C]] , why not delete millions of other players with similar careers which are approved ???? I put a valid evidence of Ivan Smolović career ( soccerway profil, soccer punter , FA Montenegro national site , Sport1.de and others ) ! I expect you to approve Ivan Smolović ,and I assure you that this will be your good choice...

Revision as of 18:30, 14 November 2013

Ivan Smolović (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy deletion was declined on the grounds that the content of the article was sufficiently different. However, the subject is as un-notable as it was two weeks ago, the last time it was afd'ed. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:09, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - for the same reasons it was deleted two weeks ago. It would be useful if G4 criteria of CSD was expanded to include cases where the original case for deletion still stands, as there is nothing "sufficiently different" in terms of the reason it should be deleted again as it was deleted before. C679 16:41, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In replay to C , why not delete millions of other players with similar careers which are approved ???? I put a valid evidence of Ivan Smolović career ( soccerway profil, soccer punter , FA Montenegro national site , Sport1.de and others ) ! I expect you to approve Ivan Smolović ,and I assure you that this will be your good choice...