Jump to content

Talk:Belgium in World War I: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 94.8.92.201 - ""
Line 22: Line 22:


The whole point of the plan was not to conquer Paris but to swing by it, 'keep the right wing strong'. The Belgian and BEF success was not that they stopped an attack on Paris but that they cut the German offensive in the north off <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.8.92.201|94.8.92.201]] ([[User talk:94.8.92.201|talk]]) 17:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The whole point of the plan was not to conquer Paris but to swing by it, 'keep the right wing strong'. The Belgian and BEF success was not that they stopped an attack on Paris but that they cut the German offensive in the north off <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/94.8.92.201|94.8.92.201]] ([[User talk:94.8.92.201|talk]]) 17:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== ARA "the American arm" of the CRB? ==

The article currently states, that at "its peak, the American arm [of the [[Commission for Relief in Belgium|CRB]]], the [[American Relief Administration]] (ARA) fed 10.5 million people daily". In fact the ARA had not been the "American arm" of the CRB. The ARA was the successor oft the [[United States Food Administration]] and founded in February 1919. ----[[Special:Contributions/130.83.23.163|130.83.23.163]] ([[User talk:130.83.23.163|talk]]) 09:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:36, 16 November 2013

WikiProject iconBelgium C‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: World War I C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
World War I task force

New article

This article assembles portions of other articles and adds new material. see the talk page at Talk:History of Belgium. Rjensen (talk) 10:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The importance of precision

I'd just like to spotlight a feature which pervades this otherwise very good article. It is exemplified by: "The Germans were angry" (formerly in the "Rape of Belgium" paragraph). Does this indicate that several million Germans were, indeed, angry at Belgium? The overall message is fine, but unfortunately the language is so broad as to sound like the whole idea is made up. Could we be a bit more precise in the rest of the article? Best wishes --Brigade Piron (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

well it's what happened -- German soldiers (in Belgium) were very much angered and outraged at what they thought were atrocities committed by Belgian civilians, so they retaliated in kind. (the atrocities they thought happened to them were imaginary) Rjensen (talk) 12:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

schleiffen plan

The whole point of the plan was not to conquer Paris but to swing by it, 'keep the right wing strong'. The Belgian and BEF success was not that they stopped an attack on Paris but that they cut the German offensive in the north off — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.8.92.201 (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ARA "the American arm" of the CRB?

The article currently states, that at "its peak, the American arm [of the CRB], the American Relief Administration (ARA) fed 10.5 million people daily". In fact the ARA had not been the "American arm" of the CRB. The ARA was the successor oft the United States Food Administration and founded in February 1919. ----130.83.23.163 (talk) 09:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]