Talk:Calderstones Park: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Merge?: re no consensus |
Snowmanradio (talk | contribs) re rate to Start, replaced: |auto=yes}} → }} , |importance=mid}} → |importance=Mid}} , {{WikiProject England|class=Stub}} → {{WikiProject England|class=Start}} using AWB |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Merseyside|class=C|importance= |
{{WikiProject Merseyside|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject England|class= |
{{WikiProject England|class=Start}} |
||
== Merge? == |
== Merge? == |
||
Revision as of 18:46, 3 December 2013
![]() | Merseyside C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | England Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Merge?
Should the article Calderstones House be merged with Calderstones Park? Tsange (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- No, I wouldn’t feel any pressing need to merge them; what’s the gain? Swanny18 (talk) 19:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- No. The building is listed and the park big.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 21:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- Consensus over five months seems to be to against merger, so I'll remove the tag. Rodhullandemu 18:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)