Talk:Operation Big: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
MILHIST Assessment - Stub class |
upr |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{WPMILHIST|class=Start|British=yes|US=yes|Intel=yes|Weaponry=yes|WWII=yes}} |
|||
{{WPMILHIST |
|||
|class=Stub |
|||
|British=yes |
|||
|US=yes |
|||
|Intel=yes |
|||
|Weaponry=yes |
|||
|WWII=yes |
|||
}} |
|||
==Untitled== |
==Untitled== |
Revision as of 02:03, 4 December 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Big article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Military history: Intelligence / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
Useful references here and here (German). BTW the device captured at Haigerloch was a sigma pile, i.e. a subcritical assembly for testing basic nuclear properties. Securiger 15:15, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class intelligence articles
- Intelligence task force articles
- Start-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- Start-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- Start-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- Start-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles