Talk:USS Ranger (CV-4): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:56, 16 December 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Ranger (CV-4) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 25, 2013.

Which flag?

After discussions, the advice is to use naval ensigns, not jacks - see Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Tables. The correct US flag has been selected by a template - see the US entry in Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Ensigns. Folks at 137 12:43, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request Ranger (CV-4) page be moved up from a stub

I want to request a review of this page by editors as a candidate to be moved from a stub article to a full article based on the fact that it has now been extensively inline referenced and verifiably sourced with citations applied.

Ussrangercv4 (talk) 01:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Inaccuracy

Friedman in his book US Aircraft Carriers says that the Ranger was unprotected and on page 391 lists "none" as the belt, bulkhead and deck armor. Do we know for sure the armor cited in the article is correct?Ski206 (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  NavsourceLists her having 2" sides and bulkheads. I've read she did not have a belt
   and looking at all of the pictures and models found around the Internet I'd have to agree. They didn't make internal belts in
   those days. I think labeling it a belt is inaccurate. --Traumatic (talk) 02:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 Friedman in his book ''US Aircraft Carriers'' says that the ''Ranger''  was unprotected and on page 391 lists "none" as the belt, bulkhead and deck armor. Do we know for sure the armor cited in the article is correct?[[User:Ski206|Ski206]] ([[User talk:Ski206|talk]]) 01:40, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
+   [http://www.navsource.org/archives/02/04.htm Navsource]Lists her having 2" sides and bulkheads. I've read she did not have a belt
+    and looking at all of the pictures and models found around the Internet I'd have to agree. They didn't make internal belts in
+    those days. I think labeling it a belt is inaccurate. --[[User:Traumatic|Traumatic]] ([[User talk:Traumatic|talk]]) 02:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)