Jump to content

Talk:Scarface (1932 film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Telegonus (talk | contribs)
Telegonus (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:
}}
}}


10:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[[User:Telegonus|Telegonus]] ([[User talk:Telegonus|talk]])×[[User:Telegonus|Telegonus]] ([[User talk:Telegonus|talk]]) 10:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)==Pre-Code==
==Pre-Code==
I was wondering, what makes this film pre-code? Wasn't the code written in 1930?
I was wondering, what makes this film pre-code? Wasn't the code written in 1930?



Revision as of 10:50, 22 December 2013

10:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Telegonus (talkTelegonus (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)==Pre-Code== I was wondering, what makes this film pre-code? Wasn't the code written in 1930?[reply]

The Production Code went into effect in 1934, and it compelled Hollywood to produce kinder, gentler films, historical biographies, adaptations of classic and modern novels and plays, and romantic comedies.

Sex

was there some creepy sex stuff in this movie?

Since it was made in the 30's, likely not... 81.232.72.53 23:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it was Pre-Code. --Nelson Ricardo 01:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No but there was creepy subtext. Tony is shown to love his sister in a not entirely brotherly way --213.155.214.19 19:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Al Capone

Did he see this movie? I bet he did, as it is about him and all. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.143.232.224 (talk) 20:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I doubt that "Al Capone liked the movie so much he owned his own copy of it". since Al Capone was known to kill people for calling him Scarface. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.233.100 (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate Ending

The section on the alternate ending makes little sense because the original ending is not described anywhere in the article; I don't think the writers should assume most Wikipedia readers are familiar with a 1930's film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.180.47.218 (talk) 12:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.19.104.19 (talk) 15:38, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]