Jump to content

User talk:ThatHurtsMyHead: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
This account has been indefinitely blocked for edit warring and sockpuppetry.
 
{{unblock|reason== I only have ONE account. I've only reverted two changes someone has made. Apparently one of those was a change an administrator made that he doesn't understand. And he indefinitely blocked my account - vindictively.> ~~~~
Line 1: Line 1:
{{unblock|reason= I only have ONE account that I just created a few weeks ago. I've only reverted two changes someone has made. Apparently one of those was a change an administrator made that he doesn't understand. And he vindictively indefinitely blocked my account for a bogus reason. (again I only have ONE account). He removed "Suicide Headache" from the Cluster Headache page. In FACT Cluster Headache is referenced in many medical journals as Suicide Headache. Anyone can google it and see.> [[User:ThatHurtsMyHead|ThatHurtsMyHead]] ([[User talk:ThatHurtsMyHead#top|talk]]) 16:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)}}
== Indefinitely blocked ==


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for using an [[WP:SOCK|illegitimate alternative account]] specifically for the purpose of [[WP:edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Cluster headache]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. &nbsp;— [[User:Scott Martin|'''<span style="color:#000">Scott</span>''']] <span style="color:#900">•</span> [[User talk:Scott Martin|''<span style="color:#000">talk</span>'']] 15:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for using an [[WP:SOCK|illegitimate alternative account]] specifically for the purpose of [[WP:edit warring|edit warring]], as you did at [[:Cluster headache]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. &nbsp;— [[User:Scott Martin|'''<span style="color:#000">Scott</span>''']] <span style="color:#900">•</span> [[User talk:Scott Martin|''<span style="color:#000">talk</span>'']] 15:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->

Revision as of 16:14, 2 January 2014

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ThatHurtsMyHead (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I only have ONE account that I just created a few weeks ago. I've only reverted two changes someone has made. Apparently one of those was a change an administrator made that he doesn't understand. And he vindictively indefinitely blocked my account for a bogus reason. (again I only have ONE account). He removed "Suicide Headache" from the Cluster Headache page. In FACT Cluster Headache is referenced in many medical journals as Suicide Headache. Anyone can google it and see.> ThatHurtsMyHead (talk) 16:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I only have ONE account that I just created a few weeks ago. I've only reverted two changes someone has made. Apparently one of those was a change an administrator made that he doesn't understand. And he vindictively indefinitely blocked my account for a bogus reason. (again I only have ONE account). He removed "Suicide Headache" from the Cluster Headache page. In FACT Cluster Headache is referenced in many medical journals as Suicide Headache. Anyone can google it and see.> [[User:ThatHurtsMyHead|ThatHurtsMyHead]] ([[User talk:ThatHurtsMyHead#top|talk]]) 16:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I only have ONE account that I just created a few weeks ago. I've only reverted two changes someone has made. Apparently one of those was a change an administrator made that he doesn't understand. And he vindictively indefinitely blocked my account for a bogus reason. (again I only have ONE account). He removed "Suicide Headache" from the Cluster Headache page. In FACT Cluster Headache is referenced in many medical journals as Suicide Headache. Anyone can google it and see.> [[User:ThatHurtsMyHead|ThatHurtsMyHead]] ([[User talk:ThatHurtsMyHead#top|talk]]) 16:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I only have ONE account that I just created a few weeks ago. I've only reverted two changes someone has made. Apparently one of those was a change an administrator made that he doesn't understand. And he vindictively indefinitely blocked my account for a bogus reason. (again I only have ONE account). He removed "Suicide Headache" from the Cluster Headache page. In FACT Cluster Headache is referenced in many medical journals as Suicide Headache. Anyone can google it and see.> [[User:ThatHurtsMyHead|ThatHurtsMyHead]] ([[User talk:ThatHurtsMyHead#top|talk]]) 16:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using an illegitimate alternative account specifically for the purpose of edit warring, as you did at Cluster headache. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — Scott talk 15:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]