Talk:List of Interplay games: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Frecklefoot (talk | contribs) →Deletion: not now |
proposed we keep this page. |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I disagree. When the list looked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Interplay_games&oldid=560359540 like this]], I probably would've agreed. But now that we're converting it to look [[List of Electronic Arts games|like this]], it has much more value and information than a simple category does. — [[User:Frecklefoot|Frεcklεfσσt]] | [[User talk:Frecklefoot|Talk]] 01:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
:I disagree. When the list looked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Interplay_games&oldid=560359540 like this]], I probably would've agreed. But now that we're converting it to look [[List of Electronic Arts games|like this]], it has much more value and information than a simple category does. — [[User:Frecklefoot|Frεcklεfσσt]] | [[User talk:Frecklefoot|Talk]] 01:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC) |
||
I really like the format of this page and I think we should keep it. It is providing a lot of good details at a glance as opposed to the other page. |
Revision as of 03:54, 4 March 2014
![]() | Indexes | |||
|
![]() | Links from this article with broken #section links : You can remove this template after fixing the problems | FAQ | Report a problem |
Deletion
After we move all content to Category: Interplay Entertainment games, really there's no point in keeping this page alive. I propose its deletion. Punkalyptic (talk) 23:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- I disagree. When the list looked like this], I probably would've agreed. But now that we're converting it to look like this, it has much more value and information than a simple category does. — Frεcklεfσσt | Talk 01:49, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
I really like the format of this page and I think we should keep it. It is providing a lot of good details at a glance as opposed to the other page.