Talk:The Courier-Mail: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 19:46, 28 March 2014

Australia: Queensland Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Australia portal The Courier-Mail is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

The Courier Mail published an article 'Scissor Killer' around or on June/October 1980/1983? Can anyone direct me to this article which seems not to be found? ronjan@mc2.vicnet.net.au

An article THAT old will never be online for most newspapers (it is well before the internet took off), especially a News Ltd one. I suggest a library, particularly the State Library. Dankru 10:04, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

From the last paragraph:

"It is common in government and political circles to discuss if any decision would pass the "Courier-Mail Test", meaning that if the results of the action were to go public, and all the positive aspects removed, how would any potential negative aspects be scandalised by the Courier Mail and thus what risks need to be mitigated early".

Presumably this has been referenced from somewhere; could someone provide the source? (link, page number etc.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.85.121 (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Let Me Google That For You:

http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/speaker-urges-retention-of-parly-changes/story-e6frfku9-1226740134720 http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/50098258 http://www.qirc.qld.gov.au/resources/pdf/published/2011/june/decision_td17_2010_100611.pdf http://timkastelle.org/blog/2010/06/good-failure-and-bad-failure-in-public-sector-innovation/ http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/queensland-health-boss-quits-over-payroll-bullying-20101020-16t6p.html http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/uncovered-meat-facebook-and-a-simmering-melting-pot/

Sorry don't have time to add these, plus I have no idea how , )

Avaiki (talk) 19:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Political Position?

Found a paper which gives the "evidence" quoted but other factors argue for a left of centre position. My own understanding is that it is, for the most part, a left of centre paper - editorials and the odd columnist\blogger aside. Given the discrepancy a blanket "right wing paper" statement is not really appropriate right? 114.35.25.165 (talk) 13:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]