Talk:Ricardian (Richard III): Difference between revisions
Tpbradbury (talk | contribs) update project boxes |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Entry changed on the Society's request (I am developing the Richard III wiki). [[User:Jackiespeel|Jackiespeel]] ([[User talk:Jackiespeel|talk]]) 21:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC) |
Entry changed on the Society's request (I am developing the Richard III wiki). [[User:Jackiespeel|Jackiespeel]] ([[User talk:Jackiespeel|talk]]) 21:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
== The Richard III Society should have their own article == |
|||
The Richard III Society should have their own article given that they found the body of [[Richard III]], a significant historical contribution, comparable to [[Howard Carter]] finding the tomb of [[Tutankhamun]]. |
Revision as of 18:00, 5 April 2014
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Organizations C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | English Royalty C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
I wonder if this article and Richard III Society should be merged? Avalon 04:31, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
Categories
Should this article really be in the "English historians" category? "Ricardians" could be a category for historians - "Ricardian" is not a historian. This seems so clear that I wonder if I have missed something obvious, hence this note without an edit (as yet - nb. that I have made unrelated changes in the first paragraph. "unsigned preceding comment" written by self in error). —Preceding unsigned comment added by RJ Gordon (talk • contribs) 23:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Made alteration as no objections raised. (RJ Gordon (talk) 22:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC))
Entry changed on the Society's request (I am developing the Richard III wiki). Jackiespeel (talk) 21:29, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
The Richard III Society should have their own article
The Richard III Society should have their own article given that they found the body of Richard III, a significant historical contribution, comparable to Howard Carter finding the tomb of Tutankhamun.