Jump to content

Degree diameter problem: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Addbot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q5251835
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[graph theory]], the '''degree diameter problem''' is the problem of finding the largest possible [[graph (mathematics)|graph]] ''G'' (in terms of the size of its [[vertex (graph theory)|vertex]] set ''V'') of [[distance (graph theory)|diameter]] ''k'' such that the largest [[degree (graph theory)|degree]] of any of the vertices in ''G'' is at most ''d''. The size of ''G'' is bounded above by the [[Moore graph|Moore bound]]; for 1&nbsp;<&nbsp;''k'' and 2&nbsp;<&nbsp;''d'' only the [[Petersen graph]], the [[Hoffman-Singleton graph]], and maybe a graph of diameter ''k''&nbsp;=&nbsp;2 and degree ''d''&nbsp;=&nbsp;57 attain the Moore bound. In general the largest degree-diameter graphs are much smaller in size than the Moore bound.
In [[graph theory]], the '''degree diameter problem''' is the problem of finding the largest possible [[graph (mathematics)|graph]] ''G'' (in terms of the size of its [[vertex (graph theory)|vertex]] set ''V'') of [[distance (graph theory)|diameter]] ''k'' such that the largest [[degree (graph theory)|degree]] of any of the vertices in ''G'' is at most ''d''. The size of ''G'' is bounded above by the [[Moore graph|Moore bound]]; for 1&nbsp;<&nbsp;''k'' and 2&nbsp;<&nbsp;''d'' only the [[Petersen graph]], the [[Hoffman-Singleton graph]], and maybe a graph of diameter ''k''&nbsp;=&nbsp;2 and degree ''d''&nbsp;=&nbsp;57 attain the Moore bound. In general the largest degree-diameter graphs are much smaller in size than the Moore bound.

== Formula ==
Let <math>n_{d,k}</math> be the maximum possible of vertices for a graph with degree at most ''d'' and diameter ''k'' then <math>n_{d,k}\leq M_{d,k}</math>, where <math>M_{d,k}</math> is the [[Moore bound]]:

:<math>M_{d,k}=\begin{cases}1+d\frac{(d-1)^k-1}{d-2}&\text{ if }d>2\\2d+1&\text{ if }d=2\end{cases}</math>

This bound is attained for very few graphs, thus the study moves to how close there exist graphs to the Moore bound.
For asymptotic behaviour note that <math>M_{d,k}\in d^k+O(d^{k-1})</math>.

Define the parameter <math>\mu_k=\liminf_{d\to\infty}\frac{n_{d,k}}{d^k}</math>. It is conjectured that <math>\mu_k=1</math> for all ''k''. It is known that <math>\mu_1=\mu_2=\mu_3=\mu_5=1</math> and that <math>\mu_4\geq 1/4</math>. For the general case it is known that <math>\mu_k\geq 1.6^k</math>. Thus, although is conjectured that <math>\mu_k=1</math> is still open if it is actually exponential.


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 07:58, 10 April 2014

In graph theory, the degree diameter problem is the problem of finding the largest possible graph G (in terms of the size of its vertex set V) of diameter k such that the largest degree of any of the vertices in G is at most d. The size of G is bounded above by the Moore bound; for 1 < k and 2 < d only the Petersen graph, the Hoffman-Singleton graph, and maybe a graph of diameter k = 2 and degree d = 57 attain the Moore bound. In general the largest degree-diameter graphs are much smaller in size than the Moore bound.

Formula

Let be the maximum possible of vertices for a graph with degree at most d and diameter k then , where is the Moore bound:

This bound is attained for very few graphs, thus the study moves to how close there exist graphs to the Moore bound. For asymptotic behaviour note that .

Define the parameter . It is conjectured that for all k. It is known that and that . For the general case it is known that . Thus, although is conjectured that is still open if it is actually exponential.

See also

References

  • Bannai, E.; Ito, T. (1973), "On Moore graphs", J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Ser. A, 20: 191–208, MR 0323615