Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Globalcom

Reliance Globalcom

Reliance Globalcom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. Sourced mainly to SEC filings, and without sufficient independent secondary sourcing so as to establish notability, Article has been heavily edited over the years by at least seven SPAs and an account associated with the company itself, but their efforts have failed as the sourcing just isn't there. Coretheapple (talk) 14:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

• Keep. Seriously, Coretheapple... how about you drop the revenge editing based on wiki-stalking, grow up, and help us So fix it? - 208.116.141.100 (talk) 15:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Linking to Bing search results showing non-notable websites and press releases is unhelpful. The company, to be notable, requires multiple secondary sources. As the editing history of this AfD will indicate, somebody associated with the company was so insecure about the fate of the article that it employed sockpuppets to disrupt this discussion, and now unleashed an SPA IP editor engaging in personal attacks and vandalism. You're employed or paid by the company; you made two edits, one removing an "advertising" tag,[1][2] indicating that you were editing the article from the company, which is a red flag for proper scrutiny and not "wikistalking." And yes, the fact that the company itself, represented by you, can't bring the article up to Wikipedia standards is a good indicator that it just can't be done by volunteeers. I see from the edit history that the article was heavily edited by a succession of SPAs over the years[3] [4][5][6][7][8], as well as User:Reliance.globalcom, so you're not the first, and yet the article still fails to satisfy WP:CORP. Coretheapple (talk) 16:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Please listen for minute, Coretheapple -- you might learn something. The link I gave to Bing News archives contains the following sources on the first page:

• Reliance Globalcom lures Pacnet's Bill Barney to CEO post, authored by Sean Buckley for Fierce Telecom, which is frequently used on Wikipedia as a reliable source.
• Reliance Globalcom Unveils New Name, Cloud Business Plan, authored by Michelle Maisto for EWeek, which is very frequently used on Wikipedia as a reliable source.
• Reliance Globalcom upgrades trans-atlantic submarine network with Ciena’s GeoMesh, found in CIOL, which is frequently used on Wikipedia as a reliable source.

You spotted a couple of press releases, and you damned the entire library of sources. This shows that you are not fit for evaluating sources, due to your harassment and wiki-stalking of my edits today on Wikipedia. What is wrong with you? (Also, see below that your obsession with "sockpuppets" is also out of place here. - 208.116.141.100 (talk) 16:30, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

• Comment I'm staying neutral on whether this article should be deleted, but can we stop talking about the sockpuppets already? They were created by banned User:Mr Wiki Pro, who is not related to either Coretheapple or 208.116.141.100. He has been disrupting a different random AFD every day for the past few days with a new set of sockpuppets. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

OK, I'm satisfied as to that, so I struck out the comments referring to the socks, but the rest stand. Coretheapple (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2014 (UTC)