Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequency fractal: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 02:02, 8 July 2014

Frequency fractal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be written in support of AjoChhand Machine which is also up for deletion as a suspected hoax. The term frequency fractal is referenced to Mandelbrot, one couldn't ask for a more impecable fractal related source. Unfortunately, I am pretty sure that Mandelbrot's book does not even mention this term (although it several years since I read it); it certainly does not appear in the contents of the book (accessible through Amazon on the Kindle version). The only source that actually uses this term is the Ghosh et al. paper, which is the claimed hoax. The rest of the extensive sources do not directly support this concept and the article is thus largely WP:OR. If it does not fail WP:HOAX it certainly fails WP:N. SpinningSpark 01:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Spinning Spark,

SpinningSpark please wait for a while, check it. Fractal is referred to Mandelbrot, not frequency fractal. You made a mistake, we wanted to refer Fractal not Frequency fractal, now corrected. Please make a google search, there is a plenty of Frequency Fractal, we thought to edit all articles in a few days, but amazing. I added a few references now, and to address your concern we have added some references, wait for a while for the changes to take place.--MasaComp (talk) 02:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 This article appears to be written in support of [[AjoChhand Machine]] which is also [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AjoChhand Machine|up for deletion]] as a suspected hoax.  The term ''frequency fractal'' is referenced to Mandelbrot, one couldn't ask for  a more impecable fractal related source.  Unfortunately, I am pretty sure that Mandelbrot's book does not even mention this term (although it several years since I read it); it certainly does not appear in the contents of the book (accessible through Amazon on the Kindle version).  The only source that actually uses this term is the Ghosh ''et al.'' paper, which is the claimed hoax.  The rest of the extensive sources do not directly support this concept and the article is thus largely [[WP:OR]].  If it does not fail [[WP:HOAX]] it certainly fails [[WP:N]]. [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] 01:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:38, 8 July 2014 (UTC)</small>
+'''Reply to Spinning Spark''',
+ [[User:Spinningspark|<b style="background:#FAFAD2;color:#C08000">Spinning</b>]][[User talk:Spinningspark|<b style="color:#4840A0">Spark</b>]] please wait for a while, check it. Fractal is referred to Mandelbrot, not frequency fractal. You made a mistake, we wanted to refer Fractal not Frequency fractal, now corrected. Please make a google search, there is a plenty of Frequency Fractal, we thought to edit all articles in a few days, but amazing. I added a few references now, and to address your concern we have added some references, wait for a while for the changes to take place.--[[User:MasaComp|MasaComp]] ([[User talk:MasaComp|talk]]) 02:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)